Literature DB >> 8502856

Female urinary incontinence--psychosocial impact, self care, and consultations.

H Sandvik, E Kveine, S Hunskaar.   

Abstract

One hundred and eighty-seven Norwegian women with urinary incontinence (UI) were interviewed after having responded to a marketing campaign for incontinence aids. Nineteen per cent stated that UI was a negligible problem. Urge incontinence was associated with more mental distress, practical inconveniences, and social restrictions than stress incontinence. Young women were more handicapped by stress incontinence than old women. Severe incontinence was associated with more mental distress and practical inconveniences than slight incontinence. A wide variety of control measures was used, the most popular being absorbent products. Only four had not used any control measure. Fifty-seven per cent had mentioned their UI-problem with a doctor. The consultation rate increased with the severity and duration of UI. Only 36% were satisfied with the outcome of the consultation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8502856     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.1993.tb00162.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci        ISSN: 0283-9318


  7 in total

1.  Management in general practice significantly reduced psychosocial consequences of female urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A Seim; R Hermstad; S Hunskaar
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  A review of the quality-of-life aspects of urinary urge incontinence.

Authors:  W R Lenderking; J F Nackley; R B Anderson; M A Testa
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Treatment of urinary incontinence in women in general practice: observational study.

Authors:  A Seim; B Sivertsen; B C Eriksen; S Hunskaar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-08

4.  Race and ethnic differences in health beliefs about lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Lisa C Welch; Elizabeth M Botelho; Sharon L Tennstedt
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Is a generic quality of life instrument helpful for evaluating women with urinary incontinence?

Authors:  Seung-June Oh; Ja Hyeon Ku
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Gender-specific external barriers to seeking care for urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Jan Svihra; Jan Luptak; Viera Svihrova; Dusan Mesko
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Severity, not type, is the main predictor of decreased quality of life in elderly women with urinary incontinence: a population-based study as part of a randomized controlled trial in primary care.

Authors:  Janka A Barentsen; Els Visser; Hedwig Hofstetter; Anna M Maris; Janny H Dekker; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.186

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.