Literature DB >> 8501637

Contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in patients with early cataracts.

L T Chylack1, G Jakubicz, B Rosner, P Khu, J Libman, J K Wolfe, N Padhye, J Friend.   

Abstract

In a population of 188 nondiabetic patients with early cataracts or nuclear brunescence, we assessed the degree to which contrast sensitivity function (CSF) provided more information about a patient's visual disability than high contrast visual acuity measurements. Data collected included LOCS II cataract classification, Bailey-Lovie visual acuity (LogMAR score), Lotmar interferometric visual acuity (LI VA), and distance contrast sensitivity function (CSF) using the Vistech 6500. Generalized least squares regression models in which CS was the dependent variable and either LogMAR score or LI VA was among the independent variables were used to ascertain whether CSF provided additional information about visual disability to that provided by LogMAR score or LI VA. Contrast sensitivity function was decreased only by nuclear opalescence at high frequencies (12 to 18 cpd); for all other cataract types and nuclear color, CSF testing provided no more information about cataract-related visual loss than LI VA or LogMAR score. Measurement of CSF using the Vistech 6500 system in patients with early cataracts provides information on visual dysfunction beyond that provided by LogMAR score or LI VA only in patients with nuclear opalescence, and that may not be clinically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8501637     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80313-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  8 in total

1.  The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research.

Authors:  K Pesudovs; C A Hazel; R M L Doran; D B Elliott
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Measurement of stray light and glare: comparison of Nyktotest, Mesotest, stray light meter, and computer implemented stray light meter.

Authors:  L J van Rijn; C Nischler; D Gamer; L Franssen; G de Wit; R Kaper; D Vonhoff; G Grabner; H Wilhelm; H J Völker-Dieben; T J T P van den Berg
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Contrast sensitivity in diabetic pregnancy.

Authors:  T Hellstedt; R Kaaja; K Teramo; I Immonen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  The assessment of lens opacities in clinical practice: results of a national survey.

Authors:  N A Frost; J M Sparrow
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Predicting individual contrast sensitivity functions from acuity and letter contrast sensitivity measurements.

Authors:  Steven M Thurman; Pinakin Gunvant Davey; Kaydee Lynn McCray; Violeta Paronian; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Evaluation of clinical validity of the Rabin cone contrast test in normal phakic or pseudophakic eyes and severely dichromatic eyes.

Authors:  Masato Fujikawa; Sanae Muraki; Yuichi Niwa; Masahito Ohji
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.761

7.  Simulating Visibility and Reading Performance in Low Vision.

Authors:  Ying-Zi Xiong; Quan Lei; Aurélie Calabrèse; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Impact of Oncoming Headlight Glare With Cataracts: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Alex D Hwang; Merve Tuccar-Burak; Robert Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.