Literature DB >> 8501471

Effects on response rates and costs of stamps vs business reply in a mail survey of physicians.

N Urban1, G L Anderson, A Tseng.   

Abstract

In the general population, the use of stamps rather than business reply postage significantly improves response rates in mail surveys. Among physicians, however, a smaller effect might be anticipated due to their greater sophistication. An experiment was conducted to test the hypothesis that stamps would improve response rates and lower costs in a physician survey that included intensive follow up. In 1989, 380 physicians who reported providing primary care were surveyed. The protocol included two mailings, a postcard reminder, and two telephone reminders. Physicians were randomly assigned to receive a return envelope with a first-class stamp or an envelope that had been preprinted "business reply mail" in the first and second mailings. Response rates, calculated as completed surveys divided by eligible physicians, were 83.8 and 72.1% for stamps and business reply respectively, a difference of 11.7 percentage points (p < 0.01). Moreover, the total cost per completed survey was $11.18 for the physicians receiving stamps and $14.25 for the physicians receiving business reply. As in mail surveys of the general public, the use of first-class stamps on return envelopes both improves response rates and reduces cost in surveys of physicians.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8501471     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90022-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  8 in total

Review 1.  Studying outcomes of intensive care unit survivors: measuring exposures and outcomes.

Authors:  Dale M Needham; David W Dowdy; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Margaret S Herridge; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-05-21       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Telephone reminders are a cost effective way to improve responses in postal health surveys.

Authors:  M Salim Silva; W T Smith; G Bammer
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Community organization to promote breast cancer screening ordering by primary care physicians.

Authors:  V M Taylor; S H Taplin; N Urban; E White; J Mahloch; K Majer; D McLerran; S Peacock
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1996-08

4.  Physicians' knowledge of and willingness to prescribe naloxone to reverse accidental opiate overdose: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Leo Beletsky; Robin Ruthazer; Grace E Macalino; Josiah D Rich; Litjen Tan; Scott Burris
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  A national physician survey on prescribing syringes as an HIV prevention measure.

Authors:  G E Macalino; D Dhawan Sachdev; J D Rich; C Becker; L J Tan; L Beletsky; S Burris
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2009-06-08

Review 6.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

7.  Effect of Small Monetary Incentive and Demographic Characteristics on Response Rate of Self-Administered Questionnaire Mailed to Rural Women.

Authors:  Lacey A McCormack
Journal:  Online J Rural Res Policy       Date:  2013

8.  Do postage stamps versus pre-paid envelopes increase responses to patient mail surveys? A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Katrina Lavelle; Chris Todd; Malcolm Campbell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.