Literature DB >> 8500242

Echocardiographic variables as prognostic indicators and therapeutic monitors in chronic congestive heart failure. Veterans Affairs cooperative studies V-HeFT I and II. V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group.

M Wong1, G Johnson, R Shabetai, V Hughes, G Bhat, B Lopez, J N Cohn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic indexes of ventricular function have become indispensable in clinical cardiology but have not been tested as prognostic markers or therapeutic monitors in clinical trials. In two Veterans Administration trials on heart failure (Vasodilator-Heart Failure Trials I and II, V-HeFT I and II), echocardiographic variables were analyzed as predictors and monitors and were compared with other indicators of cardiac performance. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Echocardiograms were recorded before randomization and at follow-up intervals. Baseline measurements of left ventricular internal diameters (LVIDd, LVIDs), wall thickness (THd, THs), radius to thickness ratios (Rd/THd, Rs/THs), and mitral E-point septal separation (EPSS) were evaluated as predictors of mortality individually, in multivariate regression models with each other, and with nonechocardiographic predictors. Within-subject changes were compared between treatment groups. Cumulative survival curves were compared between strata formed by cut-points of EPSS and Rs/THs data. In Cox regression analyses, EPSS, LVIDs, and Rs/THs were significant predictors of mortality. In V-HeFT I, Rd/THd was a predictor in the presence of ejection fraction and peak oxygen uptake. In patients with EPSS > or = 21, there was an 83% increase in mortality in the subgroup of patients with Rs/THs > or = 2.5 compared with Rs/THs < 2.5 (p = 0.003), whereas there was no statistical difference for EPSS < 21. EPSS showed improvement in patients treated with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate compared with placebo at 2 and 18 months and a trend toward deterioration between 36 and 66 months. In V-HeFT II, there were no differences between enalapril and hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate groups at follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographic variables, EPSS, LVIDs, and Rs/THs were shown to be predictors of mortality and monitors of treatment for heart failure in clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8500242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  21 in total

Review 1.  Novel techniques for assessment of left ventricular systolic function.

Authors:  Sonal Chandra; Hicham Skali; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Predicting survival in heart failure.

Authors:  Viorel G Florea; Inder S Anand
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Pleiotropic effects of cardiac drugs on healing post-MI. The good, bad, and ugly.

Authors:  Bodh I Jugdutt
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 4.  Comparison of Echocardiography, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, and Computed Tomographic Imaging for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Function: Part 1 (Global Assessment).

Authors:  Menhel Kinno; Prashant Nagpal; Stephen Horgan; Alfonso H Waller
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Ejection fraction improvement and reverse remodeling achieved with Sacubitril/Valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients.

Authors:  Aws Almufleh; Jeffrey Marbach; Sharon Chih; Ellamae Stadnick; Ross Davies; Peter Liu; Lisa Mielniczuk
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2017-12-20

Review 6.  Phase II trials in heart failure: the role of cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Sanjiv J Shah; Gregg C Fonarow; Mihai Gheorghiade; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Quantitative evaluation of drug or device effects on ventricular remodeling as predictors of therapeutic effects on mortality in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analytic approach.

Authors:  Daniel G Kramer; Thomas A Trikalinos; David M Kent; George V Antonopoulos; Marvin A Konstam; James E Udelson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  How reliable are left ventricular ejection fraction cut offs assessed by echocardiography for clinical decision making in patients with heart failure?

Authors:  Beat A Kaufmann; Son Y Min; Kaatje Goetschalckx; Alain M Bernheim; Peter T Buser; Matthias E Pfisterer; Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  The role of echocardiography in the diagnosis and management of heart failure.

Authors:  Antonio Vitarelli; Susan Tiukinhoy; Silvia Di Luzio; Manuela Zampino; Mihai Gheorghiade
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.214

10.  Comparison of contrast enhanced three dimensional echocardiography with MIBI gated SPECT for the evaluation of left ventricular function.

Authors:  Bernard Cosyns; David Haberman; Steven Droogmans; Sandrine Warzée; Philippe Mahieu; Eric Laurent; Marie Moonen; Sophie Hernot; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.