Literature DB >> 8499990

Transrectal ultrasound examination of the prostate: complications and acceptance by patients.

G Aus1, C G Hermansson, J Hugosson, K V Pedersen.   

Abstract

Transrectal ultrasound scan (TRUS) of the prostate was performed on 511 patients, 391 of whom also underwent between 1 and 5 transrectal 1.2 mm core biopsies. The infection rate in the whole group was 4.1%; 32% of the patients were given antibiotic prophylaxis with norfloxacin 400 mg twice daily for 1 week and in this group the infection rate was 0.8%. In the remaining patients, who received 400 mg norfloxacin at the time of biopsy and another 400 mg the same evening, the infection rate was 5.6%. The only risk factor identified for post-biopsy infection was steroid medication. Only minor discomfort (or none at all) was reported by 95% of patients during the examination procedure. If TRUS was combined with core biopsy 92% reported either minor or no discomfort. Of 78 patients who experienced both finger-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy and TRUS-guided core biopsy 82% preferred the latter procedure. TRUS and core biopsy proved acceptable to most patients. Antibiotic treatment with 2 tablets of norfloxacin failed to prevent infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8499990     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb15992.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  19 in total

1.  [Complications of transrectal prostate biopsy. Determination of current status].

Authors:  H W Gottfried; B Volkmer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary?

Authors:  Jordi Puig; Anna Darnell; Patricia Bermúdez; Antoni Malet; Guadalupe Serrate; Marisa Baré; Joan Prats
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A near-fatal case of sepsis with an antibiotic-resistant organism complicating a routine transrectal prostate biopsy in a health care worker.

Authors:  Bryce Weber; John Saliken; Taj Jadavji; Robin R Gray; Ron Moore
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 3. Physical, psychological and social harm.

Authors:  K G Marshall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Two cases of retrovesical haematoma following prostatic biopsy.

Authors:  V Saçak; M G Toktaş; I Bozkurt; R Tokuç; E Unlüer
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal biopsy of the prostate: a prospective randomized study of the prophylactic use of single dose oral fluoroquinolone versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Authors:  K Isen; B Küpeli; Z Sinik; S Sözen; I Bozkirli
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  MR imaging-guided interventions in the genitourinary tract: an evolving concept.

Authors:  Fiona M Fennessy; Kemal Tuncali; Paul R Morrison; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.266

8.  Comparison between ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Doğan Atılgan; Yusuf Gençten; Engin Kölükçü; Şahin Kılıç; Nihat Uluocak; Bekir Süha Parlaktaş; Fikret Erdemir
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

9.  Determinants of complications after multiple transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  M Norberg; L Holmberg; M Häggman; A Magnusson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  MR imaging-guided interventions in the genitourinary tract: an evolving concept.

Authors:  Fiona M Fennessy; Kemal Tuncali; Paul R Morrison; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.