Literature DB >> 8499948

Mitotic errors in somatic cells cause trisomy 21 in about 4.5% of cases and are not associated with advanced maternal age.

S E Antonarakis1, D Avramopoulos, J L Blouin, C C Talbot, A A Schinzel.   

Abstract

The study of DNA polymorphisms has permitted the determination of the parental and meiotic origin of the supernumerary chromosome 21 in families with free trisomy 21. Chromosomal segregation errors in somatic cells during mitosis were recognized after analysis of DNA markers in the pericentromeric region and (in order to identify recombination events) along the long arm of chromosome 21. Mitotic errors accounted for about 4.5% (11 of 238) of free trisomy 21 cases examined. The mean maternal age of mitotic errors was 28.5 years and there was no association with advanced maternal age. There was no preference in the parental origin of the duplicated chromosome 21. The 43 maternal meiosis II errors in this study had a mean maternal age of 34.1 years-the highest mean maternal age of all categories of chromosomal segregation errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8499948     DOI: 10.1038/ng0293-146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  33 in total

1.  A case of apparent trisomy 21 without the Down's syndrome phenotype.

Authors:  D Avramopoulos; I Kennerknecht; G Barbi; D Eckert; J M Delabar; C Maunoury; A Hallberg; M B Petersen
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Association between nondisjunction and maternal age in meiosis-II human oocytes.

Authors:  T Dailey; B Dale; J Cohen; S Munné
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Chromosomal mosaicism in mouse two-cell embryos after paternal exposure to acrylamide.

Authors:  Francesco Marchetti; Jack Bishop; Xiu Lowe; Andrew J Wyrobek
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  The mechanisms involved in formation of deletions and duplications of 15q11-q13.

Authors:  W P Robinson; F Dutly; R D Nicholls; F Bernasconi; M Peñaherrera; R C Michaelis; D Abeliovich; A A Schinzel
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  When does maternal age-dependent trisomy 21 arise relative to meiosis?

Authors:  C J Zheng; B Byers
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Premeiotic trisomy 21 in oocytes and Down syndrome: a reply to Zheng and Byers's hypothesis.

Authors:  S E Antonarakis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Molecular studies of the aetiology of trisomy 8 in spontaneous abortions and the liveborn population.

Authors:  R S James; P A Jacobs
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 8.  Human female meiosis: new insights into an error-prone process.

Authors:  D Warburton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Advanced maternal age and the risk of Down syndrome characterized by the meiotic stage of chromosomal error: a population-based study.

Authors:  P W Yoon; S B Freeman; S L Sherman; L F Taft; Y Gu; D Pettay; W D Flanders; M J Khoury; T J Hassold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Maternal age and risk for trisomy 21 assessed by the origin of chromosome nondisjunction: a report from the Atlanta and National Down Syndrome Projects.

Authors:  Emily Graves Allen; Sallie B Freeman; Charlotte Druschel; Charlotte A Hobbs; Leslie A O'Leary; Paul A Romitti; Marjorie H Royle; Claudine P Torfs; Stephanie L Sherman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.