Literature DB >> 8499893

Simplified method for the interpretation of immunoblots for Lyme borreliosis.

S J Cutler1, D J Wright, V H Luckhurst.   

Abstract

Interpretation of immunoblot results for Lyme borreliosis remains an area of controversy. This study was undertaken to devise a simple method which incorporated distinctions between specific and non-specific bands. A numerical value was assigned to bands reflecting their relative importance. This scheme was evaluated with sera from 61 forestry workers, which were previously tested by immunoblotting and interpreted subjectively. These results were reported as five separate categories representing levels of reactivity. A total of 72% (44) of sera fell into the same categories as they were originally reported. The method was also assessed with 40 sera routinely submitted for Lyme borreliosis serology. These were interpreted by two members of staff without previous experience of immunoblotting. Their results gave 80% and 72.5% agreement with those of an experienced person used to reading immunoblots for Lyme borreliosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8499893     DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1993.tb00340.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0928-8244


  4 in total

1.  New laboratory guidelines for serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease: evaluation of the two-test protocol.

Authors:  T B Ledue; M F Collins; W Y Craig
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Improved serodiagnosis of Lyme disease.

Authors:  M M Davidson; S M Chisholm; A D Wiseman; A W Joss; D O Ho-Yen
Journal:  Clin Mol Pathol       Date:  1996-04

3.  Predictive value of serology in diagnosing Lyme borreliosis.

Authors:  S J Cutler; D J Wright
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Serological evidence for Borrelia burgdorferi infection associated with clinical signs in dairy cattle in Slovakia.

Authors:  A Stefancíková; G Stĕpánová; M Derdáková; B Pet'ko; J Kysel'ová; J Cigánek; L Strojný; L Cisláková; M Trávnicek
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.459

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.