Literature DB >> 8499643

Expression of unusual immunophenotype combinations in acute myelogenous leukemia.

C L Reading1, E H Estey, Y O Huh, D F Claxton, G Sanchez, L W Terstappen, M C O'Brien, S Baron, A B Deisseroth.   

Abstract

Immunophenotypes for 272 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) were analyzed using a panel of 22 antibodies. Numerical evidence for unusual coexpressions (present in normal marrow at < or = 0.1%) of surface markers on > or = 10% of the blast cells was found in 85% of all cases. Asynchronous expression of myeloid differentiation antigens occurred in 70% of the cases. Unusual coexpression of T-lymphoid, B-lymphoid, or natural killer (NK) markers with myeloid markers occurred in 38%, 13%, and 21%, respectively, of all AML cases. Two- and three-color analyses confirmed coexpression in 15 of 15 cases, and indicated that these percentages are an underestimate, because coexpression can be demonstrated in cases without numerical overlap. These data indicate that the unusual coexpression of normal differentiation antigens is a common occurrence in AML. Markers in 12 of 13 patients were similar between presentation and relapse, and in two patients, unusual phenotypes detected at first relapse were shown at second relapse, indicating these immunophenotypes are stable in the majority of AML patients. Significant correlations were found between t(8;21) cytogenetics and coexpression of CD19 with CD15 or CD34, t(9;22) and coexpression of CD19 and CD34, and t(15;17) and coexpression of CD2 and myeloid antigens. Multiparameter fluorescence analysis allows detection of unusual phenotypes when the blast counts are < 5% (classical remission). Analysis of 16 patients in remission indicated the presence of presentation phenotypes in 0.2% to 7.9% of the lymphocyte + blast light scatter region, representing 0.03% to 1.4% of the total nucleated marrow cells. Of the 16 patients with > or = 4 months follow-up after detection of these cells, 6 of 6 patients with > or = 0.2% unusual presentation phenotypic marrow cells have relapsed, while 9 of 10 patients with < 0.2% remain in remission. The detection of cells with the unusual presentation phenotype may reflect residual AML cells, and their increase may predict relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8499643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  15 in total

1.  Aberrant phenotype in Iranian patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Mehdi Jahedi; Karim Shamsasenjan; Zohreh Sanaat; Mohammadreza Aliparasti; Shohreh Almasi; Mozhdeh Mohamadian; Babak Nejati; Amir Kamalifar; Ali Akbar Movassaghpour
Journal:  Adv Pharm Bull       Date:  2013-12-23

Review 2.  Multi-color flow cytometric immunophenotyping for detection of minimal residual disease in AML: past, present and future.

Authors:  J M Jaso; S A Wang; J L Jorgensen; P Lin
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Expression of human liver HSPGs on acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Preeyanat Vongchan; Robert J Linhardt
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 4.  Methods of Detection of Measurable Residual Disease in AML.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Brent L Wood
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.952

5.  CD79 alpha expression in acute myeloid leukemia. High frequency of expression in acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Authors:  D A Arber; K A Jenkins; M L Slovak
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Does microgranular variant morphology of acute promyelocytic leukemia independently predict a less favorable outcome compared with classical M3 APL? A joint study of the North American Intergroup and the PETHEMA Group.

Authors:  Martin S Tallman; Haesook T Kim; Pau Montesinos; Frederick R Appelbaum; Javier de la Serna; John M Bennett; Guillermo Deben; Clara D Bloomfield; Jose Gonzalez; James H Feusner; Marcos Gonzalez; Robert Gallagher; Jose D Gonzalez-San Miguel; Richard A Larson; Gustavo Milone; Elisabeth Paietta; Chelo Rayon; Jacob M Rowe; Concha Rivas; Charles A Schiffer; Edo Vellenga; Lois Shepherd; James L Slack; Peter H Wiernik; Cheryl L Willman; Miguel A Sanz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Aberrant phenotypes in childhood and adult acute leukemia and its association with adverse prognostic factors and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Bharat Bhushan; Pradeep Singh Chauhan; Sumita Saluja; Saurabh Verma; Ashwani Kumar Mishra; Saeed Siddiqui; Sujala Kapur
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.984

8.  Monitoring of acute myeloid leukemia by flow cytometry.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kern; Susanne Schnittger
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 9.  Is minimal residual disease monitoring clinically relevant in adults with acute myelogenous leukemia?

Authors:  Karen-Sue B Carlson; Monica L Guzman
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.952

10.  Characterization of aberrant phenotypes in acute myeloblastic leukemia.

Authors:  A Macedo; A Orfão; M B Vidriales; M C López-Berges; B Valverde; M González; M D Caballero; F Ramos; M Martínez; J Fernández-Calvo
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.