Literature DB >> 8499092

The treatment of rhinophyma. 'Cold' vs laser techniques.

G Har-El1, S M Shapshay, R K Bohigian, Y P Krespi, F E Lucente.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare laser surgery and sharp blade excision of rhinophyma.
DESIGN: Retrospective study of 23 patients treated surgically for rhinophyma.
SETTING: Four academic tertiary referral medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: All 23 patients had moderate or major rhinophyma. INTERVENTION: Sixteen patients had laser surgery. Seven patients had sharp blade excision. OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of the procedure, preservation of normal tissue, the need for skin grafting, intraoperative pain and discomfort, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain and discomfort, postoperative bleeding, complications, and end results (all listed in the literature as advantages of laser surgery).
RESULTS: No difference in length of surgery, preservation of normal tissue, complications, postoperative pain, and end results. No need for skin grafting in both procedures. Less intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, easier and smoother procedure, and more comfortable postoperative care with laser surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not agree with most of the list of advantages attributed to laser rhinophyma surgery in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8499092     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1993.01880180042007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  2 in total

1.  [Esthetic rehabilitation of rhinophyma].

Authors:  J D Raguse; O Schwerdtner; M Klein; T Schrader; J Bier
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2003-12-12

2.  Microdebrider-Assisted Rhinophyma Excision.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Abushaala; Marios Stavrakas; Hisham Khalil
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.