Literature DB >> 8498912

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and management of choledocholithiasis.

T G Wilson1, P L Jeans, A Anthony, M R Cox, J Toouli.   

Abstract

The advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has led to a reassessment of the approach to the management of choledocholithiasis. In a consecutive series of 418 patients undergoing LC, common bile duct (CBD) stones were suspected pre-operatively in 130 patients. Forty-five of the patients (35%) were found to have CBD stones on either pre-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP; 20) or on operative cholangiography (OC; 25). Common bile duct stones were detected on OC in a further 12 of 288 patients (4.2%) without pre-operative suspicion of choledocholithiasis. Of the total of 57 patients with CBD stones, the duct was cleared by pre-operative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) in 15 patients. In 13 patients, two of whom had had a pre-operative ERCP and ES, duct clearance was achieved by relaxing the sphincter pharmacologically and flushing the CBD via the OC catheter. One patient had an on-table ERCP and ES with successful stone extraction during LC. Eleven patients were converted to open operation with bile duct exploration. Sixteen patients had a postoperative ERCP. In five patients the CBD stones had passed spontaneously in the time between LC and ERCP. Ten patients required ES to clear the duct of stones. One patient had a failed ERCP and is still awaiting a repeat. The remaining patient was scheduled, but did not return for follow-up ERCP. In summary, pre-operative ERCP was indicated in less than 10% of patients in this series.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8498912     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1993.tb00424.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg        ISSN: 0004-8682


  8 in total

1.  Common bile duct stone characteristics: correlation with treatment choice during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R A Duensing; R A Williams; J C Collins; S E Wilson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Laparoscopic management of CBD stones: an Indian experience.

Authors:  Jagdish Chander; Anubhav Vindal; Pawanindra Lal; Nikhil Gupta; Vinod Kumar Ramteke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Bobby V M Dasari; Chuan Jin Tan; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; David J Martin; Gareth Kirk; Lloyd McKie; Tom Diamond; Mark A Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-12

4.  Factors predicting outcome after selective ERCP in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  G S Robertson; P R Johnson; B J Rathbone; A C Wicks; D M Lloyd; P S Veitch
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Shea; M J Healey; J A Berlin; J R Clarke; P F Malet; R N Staroscik; J S Schwartz; S V Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Endolaparoscopic rendezvous treatment: a satisfying therapeutic choice for cholecystocholedocolithiasis.

Authors:  A Tricarico; G Cione; M Sozio; P Di Palo; V Bottino; T Tricarico; A Tartaglia; I Iazzetta; E Sessa; S Mosca; C De Nucci; P Falco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Minimizing the risk of bile duct injury at laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M R Cox; T G Wilson; P L Jeans; R T Padbury; J Toouli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Natural history of asymptomatic bile duct stones at time of cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G R Caddy; J Kirby; S J Kirk; M J Allen; R J Moorehead; T C Tham
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2005-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.