G Winokur1, W Coryell, M Keller, J Endicott, H Akiskal. 1. National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Program on the Psychobiology of Depression-Clinical Studies, Bethesda, Md.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: As part of the National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Study of the Psychobiology of Depression, the comparative course of manic depressive (bipolar) and primary unipolar patients was assessed. DESIGN: Systematic evaluation using structured instruments every 6 months for a period of 5 years with the recording of remissions, new episodes, and subsequent hospitalizations. PATIENTS: The number of subjects varied somewhat depending on the analyses conducted. For a comparison of course in bipolar patients and unipolar patients, 148 bipolars were compared with 172 unipolar patients. RESULTS: Both unipolar and bipolar patients were more likely to have episodes if they had episodes prior to index admission. Likewise, prior hospitalizations predicted multiple hospitalizations in follow-up. Chronicity was significantly more prevalent among unipolar depressives but in both unipolar and bipolar patients, chronicity diminished over time. Bipolar patients were more likely than unipolar patients to have multiple episodes at the 2-year and 5-year follow-ups. In bipolar patients, there was no difference in the number of episodes in follow-up between males and females but in unipolar patients, females were significantly more likely to have subsequent hospitalizations and episodes than males. Treatment variables did not relate to these differences. A family history of mania or schizoaffective mania predicted multiple episodes in bipolar patients but not in primary unipolar depressives. A family history of all affective illness (mania, schizoaffective mania, bipolar II illness, and depression) did not predict a multiple-episode course in either bipolar or unipolar illness. In unipolar patients, the independent variables leading to multiple-episode course in follow-up are being female, an early age of onset, and prior episodes. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of this systematic follow-up study, new data add to the distinction between bipolar and primary unipolar patients both as regards number of episodes in follow-up and also as regards risk factors that are associated with the multiple-episode course.
OBJECTIVE: As part of the National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Study of the Psychobiology of Depression, the comparative course of manic depressive (bipolar) and primary unipolar patients was assessed. DESIGN: Systematic evaluation using structured instruments every 6 months for a period of 5 years with the recording of remissions, new episodes, and subsequent hospitalizations. PATIENTS: The number of subjects varied somewhat depending on the analyses conducted. For a comparison of course in bipolarpatients and unipolar patients, 148 bipolars were compared with 172 unipolar patients. RESULTS: Both unipolar and bipolarpatients were more likely to have episodes if they had episodes prior to index admission. Likewise, prior hospitalizations predicted multiple hospitalizations in follow-up. Chronicity was significantly more prevalent among unipolar depressives but in both unipolar and bipolarpatients, chronicity diminished over time. Bipolarpatients were more likely than unipolar patients to have multiple episodes at the 2-year and 5-year follow-ups. In bipolarpatients, there was no difference in the number of episodes in follow-up between males and females but in unipolar patients, females were significantly more likely to have subsequent hospitalizations and episodes than males. Treatment variables did not relate to these differences. A family history of mania or schizoaffective mania predicted multiple episodes in bipolarpatients but not in primary unipolar depressives. A family history of all affective illness (mania, schizoaffective mania, bipolar II illness, and depression) did not predict a multiple-episode course in either bipolar or unipolar illness. In unipolar patients, the independent variables leading to multiple-episode course in follow-up are being female, an early age of onset, and prior episodes. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of this systematic follow-up study, new data add to the distinction between bipolar and primary unipolar patients both as regards number of episodes in follow-up and also as regards risk factors that are associated with the multiple-episode course.
Authors: Daniel J Taylor; Heather M Walters; Jeffrey R Vittengl; Steven Krebaum; Robin B Jarrett Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2009-09-05 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Michael Strober; Boris Birmaher; Neal Ryan; David Axelson; Sylvia Valeri; Henrietta Leonard; Satish Iyengar; Mary Kay Gill; Jeffrey Hunt; Martin Keller Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Marie de Zelicourt; Roland Dardennes; Hélène Verdoux; Gian Gandhi; Babak Khoshnood; Eric Chomette; Marie-Laure Papatheodorou; Eric T Edgell; Christian Even; Francis Fagnani Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2003 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Maria A Oquendo; Jason Turret; Michael F Grunebaum; Ainsley K Burke; Ernest Poh; Ellen Stevenson; J John Mann; Hanga Galfalvy Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2013-06-02 Impact factor: 4.839