Literature DB >> 8498696

Sputum quality: can you tell by looking?

D J Flournoy1, L J Davidson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nurses are responsible for the collection of sputum samples for culture in most institutions, yet they receive little formal training on what a good specimen looks like.
METHODS: Three hundred thirty-three consecutively collected expectorated sputum samples and tracheal aspirates were examined to determine the relationship of macroscopic specimen appearance (watery, mucoid, mucopurulent) to specimen quality (good, fair, poor).
RESULTS: Of the expectorated sputum samples, 21% were watery, 65% were mucoid, and 14% were mucopurulent. Sixty-five percent of the expectorated sputum samples were good or fair, regardless of appearance. Eighty-seven percent of mucopurulent expectorated sputum samples were good or fair. In the remaining nonmucopurulent specimens, however, there were no predictable markers of specimen quality.
CONCLUSIONS: The only specimens that were predictably good were those that were mucopurulent yellow, yellow, or tracheal aspirates.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8498696     DOI: 10.1016/0196-6553(93)90226-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  1 in total

1.  Sputum colour for diagnosis of a bacterial infection in patients with acute cough.

Authors:  Attila Altiner; Stefan Wilm; Walter Däubener; Christiane Bormann; Michael Pentzek; Heinz-Harald Abholz; Martin Scherer
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.581

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.