Literature DB >> 8498631

Two random repeat recall methods to assess alcohol use.

L T Midanik1.   

Abstract

Two random repeat recall methods were compared with a summary measure to assess alcohol use. Subjects (n = 142) were randomly assigned to one of two groups; they were called either on 14 random days during three 30-day waves and asked about drinking yesterday, or on 2 random days during each wave and asked about drinking in the past week. Follow-up telephone interviews obtained summary measures for each wave. Random repeat methods generally obtained higher estimates. However, the high dropout rate makes questionable the feasibility of using this approach with general population samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8498631      PMCID: PMC1694749          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.83.6.893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  7 in total

1.  Reliability of self-reported alcohol consumption before and after December.

Authors:  L T Midanik
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  A comparison of food frequency and diet recall methods in studies of nutrient intake of low-income pregnant women.

Authors:  C J Suitor; J Gardner; W C Willett
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1989-12

3.  Interindividual and intraindividual variation in repeated measures of 24-hour dietary recall in the elderly.

Authors:  G McAvay; J Rodin
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Random repeat 24-hour dietary recalls.

Authors:  M Balogh; H A Kahn; J H Medalie
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Collection of food intake data: an evaluation of methods.

Authors:  K J Morgan; S R Johnson; R L Rizek; R Reese; G L Stampley
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1987-07

Review 6.  The validity of self-reported alcohol consumption and alcohol problems: a literature review.

Authors:  L Midanik
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1982-12

7.  Do quantity-frequency data underestimate drinking-related health risks?

Authors:  L C Sobell; T Cellucci; T D Nirenberg; M B Sobell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 9.308

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.