Literature DB >> 8498296

Intravascular ultrasonographic assessment of the results of coronary artery stenting.

W K Laskey1, S T Brady, W G Kussmaul, A R Waxler, J Krol, H C Herrmann, J W Hirshfeld, C Sehgal.   

Abstract

We studied 12 patients undergoing elective coronary stent implantation for either recurrent restenosis or adverse lesion appearance. By use of a 4.8F 20 MHz intravascular ultrasound catheter, the conventional angioplasty site was examined before and after coronary stent implantation. Quantitative angiographic analysis revealed the expected excellent final result with a group mean poststent diameter reduction of 14 +/- 9% and a cross-sectional area reduction of 22 +/- 13%. Angiographic analysis also indicated an increase in minimum stenosis diameter from 1.8 +/- 0.6 mm after conventional balloon angioplasty to 2.8 +/- 0.3 mm after coronary stent implantation. Quantitative analysis of the corresponding intravascular ultrasound images, however, revealed significant residual endoluminal obstruction. Fractional plaque area remained unchanged from 30 +/- 12% after conventional balloon angioplasty to 32 +/- 11% after stent implantation. The circumferential distribution of plaque increased significantly from 0.44 +/- 0.17 to 0.55 +/- 0.15 (p = 0.03) after stent implantation. Despite the lack of significant change in the ultrasound-determined minimum stenosis diameter after stent placement, there was a borderline significant increase in the plaque-free lumen area (before stent, 6.35 +/- 1.55 mm2; after stent, 7.25 +/- 1.6 mm2; p = 0.06). Thus, in contrast to the substantial improvement in the angiographically assessed residual luminal obstruction after stent implantation compared with the prestent condition, considerably less improvement was found by intravascular ultrasound-assessed examination. Morphometric analysis indicated a tendency toward circumferential remodeling of plaque. The inherently different approaches to vascular imaging represented by contrast angiography and intravascular ultrasound techniques appear to provide complementary information.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8498296     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(93)90743-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  6 in total

1.  Utility of intravascular ultrasound in peripheral interventions.

Authors:  R A White; C E Donayre; G E Kopchok; I Walot; C M Mehringer
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1997

Review 2.  Intracoronary ultrasound: current state of the art.

Authors:  P P Kearney; I R Starkey; G R Sutherland
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-05

3.  Randomised comparison of coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in selected patients.

Authors:  H Le Breton; J Boschat; P Commeau; P Brunel; M Gilard; C Breut; O Bar; P Geslin; A Tirouvanziam; L Maillard; B Moquet; P Barragan; P Dupouy; G Grollier; J Berland; P Druelles; R Rihani; B Huret; C Leclercq; M Bedossa
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Is coronary stent deployment and remodeling affected by predilatation? An intravascular ultrasound randomized study Stenting with or without predilation: an IVUS study.

Authors:  Jacques Boschat; Hervé Le Breton; P Commeau; Bernard Huret; Marc Bedossa; Martine Gilard
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Intracoronary ultrasound.

Authors:  C Hammond; J P Causer; R A Perry
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Stent underexpansion in angiographic guided percutaneous coronary intervention, despite adjunctive balloon post-dilatation, in drug eluting stent era.

Authors:  Mehrdad Taherioun; Mohammad Hassan Namazi; Morteza Safi; Habibolah Saadat; Hossein Vakili; Saeed Alipour-Parsa; Hasan Rajabi-Moghadam; Shamsedin Pedari
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2014-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.