Literature DB >> 8498222

Transvaginal color Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: differences in blood flow impedance in benign and malignant lesions.

U M Hamper1, S Sheth, F M Abbas, N B Rosenshein, D Aronson, R J Kurman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the blood flow characteristics of adnexal masses before surgical excision and to determine whether color flow Doppler sonography is useful for distinguishing benign from malignant masses. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one adnexal masses were evaluated with color flow Doppler transvaginal sonography. The pulsatility index and resistive index were calculated from the waveforms generated from blood flow within the ovary. Twenty-five lesions were benign and six were malignant on pathologic examination. Benign lesions included six endometriomas, six mesothelial cysts, three serous and one mucinous cystadenoma, three mature cystic teratomas, two hemorrhagic corpus luteum cysts, one cystadenofibroma, one sclerosing stromal cell tumor, one paratubal cyst, and one ovary that had undergone torsion with infarction. The malignant lesions consisted of three papillary serous cystadenocarcinomas, one granulosatheca cell tumor, one immature teratoma, and one metastasis of colon cancer to the ovaries.
RESULTS: Benign tumors and cysts had a significantly higher pulsatility index (mean, 1.93 +/- 1.02; range, 0.23-3.99) and resistive index (mean, 0.77 +/- 0.22; range, 0.2-1.0) than did malignant tumors (pulsatility index: mean, 0.77 +/- 0.33; range, 0.31-1.09; resistive index: mean, 0.5 +/- 0.17; range, 0.27-0.67). However, some overlap in individual values for benign and malignant lesions was found.
CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data suggest that high pulsatility and resistive indexes indicate benign adnexal processes; however, considerable overlap in pulsatility and resistive indexes between benign and malignant lesions was noted, and further work is needed before the validity of these factors is proved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8498222     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.160.6.8498222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

1.  Doppler ultrasound: a good and reliable predictor of ovarian malignancy.

Authors:  Dharita Shah; Sandip Shah; Jay Parikh; C J Bhatt; Kavita Vaishnav; D V Bala
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2012-11-10

Review 2.  Ovarian cancer: the clinical role of US, CT, and MRI.

Authors:  Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Chronic pelvic pain.

Authors:  Talat Uppal; C Amarasekara; Vasundhara Kaushik
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

Review 4.  PET/CT and cross sectional imaging of gynecologic malignancy.

Authors:  Revathy B Iyer; Aparna Balachandran; Catherine E Devine
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

5.  Laparoscopic management of paratubal and paraovarian cysts.

Authors:  Atef M Darwish; Ahmad F Amin; Safwat A Mohammad
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Color Doppler-ultrasonography in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Making ultrasonography more meaningful.

Authors:  Rahul Gandhi; Rahul Bhowate; Abhishek Singh Nayyar; Sweta Gandhi; Girish Dongarwar
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2016-03-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.