Literature DB >> 8497912

The adverse impact of high cyclosporine. Clearance rates on the incidences of acute rejection and graft loss.

A Lindholm1, M Welsh, L Rutzky, B D Kahan.   

Abstract

The influence of cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters on clinical events and outcome after transplantation was studied in 100 renal transplant recipients who underwent a pre- as well as posttransplant CsA pharmacokinetic evaluation. Among the patients, 30 were black and 50 were white. Black recipients had significantly lower bioavailability (F) pre- as well as posttransplantation than white recipients, the posttransplant mean F values being 25.8 +/- 9.0% and 38.1 +/- 16.7%, respectively (P < 0.002). The posttransplant CsA clearance rate (CL) and oral clearance (clearance/bioavailability; CLoral) were significantly higher in patients who had acute rejection than in those who did not, with CL mean values of 425 +/- 141 ml/min and 359 +/- 131 ml/min, respectively (P < 0.02). The initial posttransplant F was significantly lower, and the CLoral higher in patients who eventually lost their grafts than in those who did not, the mean F values being 26.5 +/- 12.8% and 38.7 +/- 17.5%, respectively (P < 0.002). Thus, several important relationships between CsA pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical events following renal transplantation were documented. The CLoral decreased during the first 3 months after transplantation (P < 0.0001), but it was stable thereafter. Neither the bioavailability nor the clearance of CsA showed a correlation with administered dose. These results indicate that certain recipient groups, such as black patients, and individuals with rapid CL, may benefit from larger CsA doses and/or shorter dosage intervals, in order to compensate for these interpatient variabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8497912     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199305000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  8 in total

Review 1.  Immunosuppression and allograft rejection following lung transplantation: evidence to date.

Authors:  Gregory I Snell; Glen P Westall; Miranda A Paraskeva
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Cytochrome P450 3A: ontogeny and drug disposition.

Authors:  S N de Wildt; G L Kearns; J S Leeder; J N van den Anker
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Genetics of acute rejection after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Casey R Dorr; William S Oetting; Pamala A Jacobson; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.782

Review 4.  Methods for clinical monitoring of cyclosporin in transplant patients.

Authors:  R J Dumont; M H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Potential clinical implications of substitution of generic cyclosporine formulations for cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) in transplant recipients.

Authors:  Atholl Johnston; Philip Belitsky; Ulrich Frei; John Horvath; Peter Hoyer; J Harold Helderman; Michael Oellerich; Stephen Pollard; Hany Riad; Paolo Rigotti; Paul Keown; Björn Nashan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  Mechanisms of clinically relevant drug interactions associated with tacrolimus.

Authors:  Uwe Christians; Wolfgang Jacobsen; Leslie Z Benet; Alfonso Lampen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Management and clinical outcome of penetrating keratoplasty for long-term corneal changes in sympathetic ophthalmia.

Authors:  Saraswathi Ramamurthi; Ebube E Obi; Gordon N Dutton; Kanna Ramaesh
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Cyclosporine: A Commentary on Brand versus Generic Formulation Exchange.

Authors:  A K Singh; S S Narsipur
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2011-11-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.