Literature DB >> 8497015

Body size and shape: a longitudinal investigation of active and sedentary boys during adolescence.

W Bell1.   

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to contrast the distance and velocity curves for height, body mass and somatotype between active (n = 33) and sedentary (n = 15) boys studied annually between 12 and 15 years. Raw measurements were rescaled and aligned according to peak velocity in height (PHV). The sedentary boys were taller up to and including PHV, active boys being taller after PHV (P > 0.05). The sedentary group had a PHV of 8.5 +/- 1.2 cm year-1 and the active group one of 9.5 +/- 1.5 cm year-1 (P < 0.05). Their ages at PHV were 14.1 +/- 0.8 and 14.2 +/- 0.9 years, respectively (P > 0.05). The active boys were lighter before PHV but heavier afterwards. Peak body mass velocities (PBMV) were larger for the active children (9.1 +/- 2.7 kg year-1) compared to the sedentary children (8.0 +/- 2.6 kg year-1) (P > 0.05). At PBMV, the active boys were aged 14.3 +/- 0.8 years and the sedentary boys 14.5 +/- 0.7 years (P > 0.05). The representative somatotype for the sedentary group was a mesomorphic ectomorph. For the active group, ectomorphic mesomorphs and mesomorphic ectomorphs were the most prominent. The sedentary children (overall mean 2.4-3.4-4.7) showed an increase in endomorphy and a decrease in mesomorphy and ectomorphy. In contrast, the active children (overall mean 2.3-3.9-4.0) demonstrated reduced endomorphy with mesomorphy and ectomorphy remaining fairly uniform. Velocities showed mesomorphy to be the most stable component in both groups (-3.0 to +0.1 units year-1). Endomorphy and ectomorphy fluctuated to a greater extent but never quite reached a velocity of one-half unit a year. Whole somatotype analyses identified significant differences between groups at PHV (P < 0.05), individual component analyses at PHV and +1 year PHV (P < 0.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8497015     DOI: 10.1080/02640419308729976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  6 in total

Review 1.  Body Size of Male Youth Soccer Players: 1978-2015.

Authors:  Robert M Malina; António J Figueiredo; Manuel J Coelho-E-Silva
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Tanner-Whitehouse Skeletal Ages in Male Youth Soccer Players: TW2 or TW3?

Authors:  Robert M Malina; Manuel J Coelho-E-Silva; António J Figueiredo; Renaat M Philippaerts; Norikazu Hirose; Maria Eugenia Peña Reyes; Giulio Gilli; Andrea Benso; Roel Vaeyens; Dieter Deprez; Luiz G A Guglielmo; Rojapon Buranarugsa
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Growth and development of young athletes. Should competition levels be age related?

Authors:  A D Baxter-Jones
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  A Comparative Study on Fat Pattern between Tribal and Non-tribal Girls of Tripura, North-East India.

Authors:  Shilpi Saha; Samir Kumar Sil
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Differences in physical fitness after an 8-week preseason training among elite football players aged 17-19 years.

Authors:  Hojun Lee; Chang-Hwa Joo
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2020-10-27

6.  Muscular Strength Spurts in Adolescent Male Basketball Players: The INEX Study.

Authors:  Eduardo Guimarães; José A R Maia; Mark Williams; Filipa Sousa; Eduardo Santos; Fernando Tavares; Manuel A Janeira; Adam D G Baxter-Jones
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.