Literature DB >> 8496537

Improved detection of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy using a new electrocardiographic algorithm.

J E Norman1, D Levy, G Campbell, J J Bailey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to use the Framingham data base to devise and test an improvement in an electrocardiographic (ECG) voltage criterion for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy that is gender specific and adjusts for age and obesity.
BACKGROUND: Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy has been receiving increasing attention. The "Cornell" ECG voltage, defined as the sum of voltages for the R wave of lead aVL and S wave of lead V3, has been shown to correlate strongly with echocardiographically estimated left ventricular mass. Because the magnitude of this voltage varies with both age and obesity, we have proposed a simple formula for its adjustment for these two variables.
METHODS: Using linear regression, the adjustment formula was estimated from data on 1,468 men and 1,883 women from the Framingham Heart Study cohort who were free of myocardial infarction and who had both an ECG and an echocardiogram recorded during the same clinic examination. A modified receiver operating characteristic curve method was used to compare sensitivities at the same specificity levels. The adjustment formula was estimated from one randomly chosen half of the study cohort and applied to the other half for evaluation.
RESULTS: Significant improvement in sensitivity for the detection of left ventricular hypertrophy was realized at all levels of specificity. At a specificity level of 98%, the adjustment increased the sensitivity of the Cornell voltage from 10% to 17% in men and from 12% to 22% in women. For severe hypertrophy, defined as a left ventricular mass > 3 SD above the gender-specific mean, the sensitivity increased from 23% to 38% for men and from 22% to 55% for women at a specificity level of 95%.
CONCLUSIONS: This approach can substantially enhance the utility of the ECG for the detection of left ventricular hypertrophy. If these results are validated in other population groups, this approach may prove valuable in the screening of hypertensive populations and for the monitoring of patients undergoing treatment for hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8496537     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90387-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  15 in total

1.  Aspects of left ventricular morphology outperform left ventricular mass for prediction of QRS duration.

Authors:  Nina Hakacova; Katarina Steding; Henrik Engblom; Jane Sjögren; Charles Maynard; Olle Pahlm
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Validity of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy in children with pressure- or volume-loaded ventricles: comparison with echocardiographic left ventricular muscle mass.

Authors:  M A Fogel; D R Lieb; M A Seliem
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Association of electrocardiographic and imaging surrogates of left ventricular hypertrophy with incident atrial fibrillation: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).

Authors:  Jonathan Chrispin; Aditya Jain; Elsayed Z Soliman; Eliseo Guallar; Alvaro Alonso; Susan R Heckbert; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Left ventricular mass in type 2 diabetes mellitus. A study employing a simple ECG index: the Cornell voltage.

Authors:  S V de Kreutzenberg; A Avogaro; A Tiengo; S Del Prato
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Diagnostic and prognostic utility of electrocardiography for left ventricular hypertrophy defined by magnetic resonance imaging in relationship to ethnicity: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Aditya Jain; Harikrishna Tandri; Darshan Dalal; Harjit Chahal; Elsayed Z Soliman; Ronald J Prineas; Aaron R Folsom; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 6.  Left ventricular hypertrophy. Prevalence in older patients and management.

Authors:  E Paciaroni; A Fraticelli
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Correlation relationship assessment between left ventricular hypertrophy voltage criteria and body mass index in 41,806 Swiss conscripts.

Authors:  Roger Abächerli; Lingchuan Zhou; Johann-Jakob Schmid; Richard Kobza; Bernhard Niggli; Franz Frey; Paul Erne
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Screening for left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the community.

Authors:  Jithendra B Somaratne; Gillian A Whalley; Katrina K Poppe; Mariska M ter Bals; Gina Wadams; Ann Pearl; Warwick Bagg; Rob N Doughty
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 9.951

9.  Hypertension images: electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  L M Prisant
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for determining left ventricular mass in young healthy men; data from the LARGE Heart study.

Authors:  Syed M Afzal Sohaib; John R Payne; Rajeev Shukla; Michael World; Dudley J Pennell; Hugh E Montgomery
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.