Literature DB >> 8496226

Evaluation of painful hip arthroplasties. Are technetium bone scans necessary?

J R Lieberman1, M H Huo, R Schneider, E A Salvati, S Rodi.   

Abstract

We reviewed the plain radiographs, bone scans and hip aspiration results of 54 patients with painful hip arthroplasties which had been explored surgically, to compare the results of the investigations with the operative findings. For acetabular loosening, the sensitivity and specificity of bone scanning were 87% and 95%, with an accuracy of 90%: for serial plain radiography sensitivity was 95%, specificity 100% and accuracy 97%. For femoral component loosening, bone scan sensitivity was 85%, specificity 100% and accuracy 89%: the sensitivity of plain radiography was 100%, with specificity 92% and accuracy 98%. Technetium bone scanning did not provide additional information with regard to loosening and is not necessary in the routine investigation of a painful hip arthroplasty. Serial pain radiography is the most effective method of detecting loosening, and bone scanning is useful only when radiography is inconclusive with regard to loosening or infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8496226     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B3.8496226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  7 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: What is the Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Component Loosening in THA?

Authors:  H John Cooper
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Prosthetic joint infections: radionuclide state-of-the-art imaging.

Authors:  Filip Gemmel; Hans Van den Wyngaert; Charito Love; M M Welling; Paul Gemmel; Christopher J Palestro
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  [Approach to painful hip resurfacing].

Authors:  L Gerdesmeyer; H Gollwitzer; P Diehl; M Fuerst; M Schmitt-Sody
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Fluoroscopy- vs ultrasound-guided aspiration techniques in the management of periprosthetic joint infection: which is the best?

Authors:  Filippo Randelli; Marco Brioschi; Pietro Randelli; Federico Ambrogi; Silvana Sdao; Alberto Aliprandi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Is there a role for tissue biopsy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection?

Authors:  Geert Meermans; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Acoustic monitoring (RFM) of total hip arthroplasty - Results of a cadaver study.

Authors:  A C Unger; H Cabrera-Palacios; A P Schulz; Ch Jürgens; Andreas Paech
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 2.175

7.  The diagnostic accuracy of radionuclide arthrography for prosthetic loosening in hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Timothy H French; Nicholas Russell; Anand Pillai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.