Literature DB >> 8495668

Occupation and the prevalence of major depression, alcohol, and drug abuse in the United States.

R E Roberts1, E S Lee.   

Abstract

These data from the ECA research program clearly indicate considerable variation in prevalence among different occupational groups in the United States for major depression, alcohol abuse/dependence, and drug abuse/dependence. For example, the crude lifetime prevalences for depression ranged from 0.7 to 8.6 per 100; for alcohol it was 7.5 to 32.6, and for drugs it was 3.1 to 10.5. The results also indicate that some occupations are associated with much higher rates of ADM problems. By way of illustration, the 6-month crude prevalence of major depression for the total sample of employed persons 18-64 years of age was 2.9. Six of the occupational groups had prevalences which exceeded this rate. The overall 6-month prevalence of alcohol abuse/dependence was 5.8, and six occupational groups had prevalences in excess of this. Similarly, the overall 6-month prevalence was 2.6 for drug abuse/dependence, and five occupational groups had prevalences which exceeded this. Translated into terms of relative risk, it is clear that among the occupational groups some are at markedly increased risk of ADM disorders. For these comparisons, we used as the baseline group in logistic regression analyses, Job 1, composed of executive, administrative, and managerial occupations. This group is the first in the Census classification, had crude rates near the overall prevalence rates for depression, alcohol, and drugs, and is also one of the occupational categories with the highest prestige. Logistic regression analyses were done with and without controls for differences among occupational groups in gender, age, and educational level. As might be expected, adjustment in general narrowed differences in prevalence among occupational groups, and even on occasion, changed the rank order of groups slightly. However, in general, those groups with higher odds ratios based on crude rates also had higher adjusted odds ratios. Table 6 summarizes our findings, based on the adjusted odds ratios. In this table, we list occupational groups which had a relative risk of 30% or greater above baseline (Job 1), for both 6 month and lifetime prevalences, for each of the three ADM disorders. As can be seen, there is virtually no overlap between risk of depression, on the one hand, and risk of alcohol or drug abuse. The exceptions are Job 4 (sales) which ranked third for major depression and second for alcohol abuse in terms of 6-month prevalence, and Job 9 (farming, fishing, forestry), which had the [table: see text] highest lifetime risk for major depression and the second-highest 6-month risk for drug abuse/dependence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8495668     DOI: 10.1006/enrs.1993.1071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  12 in total

1.  Understanding suicide in Australian farmers.

Authors:  Fiona Judd; Henry Jackson; Caitlin Fraser; Greg Murray; Garry Robins; Angela Komiti
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Underserved women in a women's health clinic describe their experiences of depressive symptoms and why they have low uptake of psychotherapy.

Authors:  Ellen L Poleshuck; Beth Cerrito; Nicole Leshoure; Gillian Finocan-Kaag; Margaret H Kearney
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2012-02-12

3.  Socioeconomic status and anxiety as predictors of antidepressant treatment response and suicidal ideation in older adults.

Authors:  Alex Cohen; Stephen E Gilman; Patricia R Houck; Katalin Szanto; Charles F Reynolds
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  Psychosocial conditions on and off the job and psychological ill health: depressive symptoms, impaired psychological wellbeing, heavy consumption of alcohol.

Authors:  H Michélsen; C Bildt
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  The impact of work environment on mood disorders and suicide: Evidence and implications.

Authors:  Jong-Min Woo; Teodor T Postolache
Journal:  Int J Disabil Hum Dev       Date:  2008

6.  [Risky alcohol consumption among working Canadians: variations among different occupations and economic sectors].

Authors:  Alain Marchand; Martin Charbonneau
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

7.  Behavioral sequelae following acute diisopropylfluorophosphate intoxication in rats: comparative effects of atropine and cannabinomimetics.

Authors:  Linnzi K M Wright; Jing Liu; Anuradha Nallapaneni; Carey N Pope
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.763

8.  Occupations, work characteristics and common mental disorder.

Authors:  S A Stansfeld; C Pike; S McManus; J Harris; P Bebbington; T Brugha; A Hassiotis; R Jenkins; H Meltzer; P Moran; C Clark
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  Occupation and mental health in a national UK survey.

Authors:  Stephen Alfred Stansfeld; F R Rasul; J Head; N Singleton
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.328

10.  Alcohol use and misuse: what are the contributions of occupation and work organization conditions?

Authors:  Alain Marchand
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.