Literature DB >> 8494832

Simulated home delivery in hospital: a randomised controlled trial.

J MacVicar1, G Dobbie, L Owen-Johnstone, C Jagger, M Hopkins, J Kennedy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcome of two methods of maternity care during the antenatal period and at delivery. One was to be midwife-led for both antenatal care and delivery, the latter taking place in rooms similar to those in one's own home to simulate home confinement. The other would be consultant-led with the mothers labouring in the delivery suite rooms with resuscitation equipment for both mother and baby in evidence, monitors present and a delivery bed on which both anaesthetic and obstetric procedures could be easily and safely carried out.
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Leicester Royal Infirmary Maternity Hospital.
SUBJECTS: Of 3510 women who were randomised, 2304 were assigned to the midwife-led scheme and 1206 were assigned to the consultant-led scheme. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complications in the antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum periods were compared as was maternal morbidity and fetal mortality and morbidity. Satisfaction of the women with care over different periods of the pregnancy and birth were assessed.
RESULTS: There were few significant differences in antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum events between the two groups. There was no difference in the percentage of mothers and babies discharged home alive and well. Generally higher levels of satisfaction with care antenatally and during labour and delivery were shown in those women allocated to midwife care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8494832     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb12972.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  25 in total

1.  Medicalization and obstetric care: an analysis of developments in Dutch midwifery.

Authors:  Anke D J Smeenk; Henk A M J ten Have
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2003

2.  UK childbirth delivery options in 2001-2002: alternatives to consultant unit booking and delivery.

Authors:  Lindsay Fp Smith; Caroline P Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Post natal use of analgesics: comparisons between conventional postnatal wards and a maternity hotel.

Authors:  Hedvig Nordeng; Anne Eskild; Britt-Ingjerd Nesheim
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2010-02-10

4.  Prospective regional study of planned home births. Home Birth Study Steering Group.

Authors:  J Davies; E Hey; W Reid; G Young
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-23

5.  Outcome in low risk pregnancies.

Authors:  R Arya; T Pethen; R B Johanson; S A Spencer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 6.  Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding.

Authors:  Olukunmi O Balogun; Elizabeth J O'Sullivan; Alison McFadden; Erika Ota; Anna Gavine; Christine D Garner; Mary J Renfrew; Stephen MacGillivray
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-09

7.  Midwife managed delivery unit: a randomised controlled comparison with consultant led care.

Authors:  V A Hundley; F M Cruickshank; G D Lang; C M Glazener; J M Milne; M Turner; D Blyth; J Mollison; C Donaldson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-11-26

8.  Should obstetricians see women with normal pregnancies? Obstetricians should focus on problems.

Authors:  D K James
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-07

9.  Management of labour in an isolated rural maternity hospital.

Authors:  A G Baird; D Jewell; J J Walker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-27

10.  Births in two different delivery units in the same clinic--a prospective study of healthy primiparous women.

Authors:  Britt Ingeborg Eide; Anne Britt Vika Nilsen; Svein Rasmussen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.