Literature DB >> 8494806

Contrast sensitivity to patch stimuli: effects of spatial bandwidth and temporal presentation.

E Peli1, L E Arend, G M Young, R B Goldstein.   

Abstract

Models of the spatial response of human vision are important for applied work, but the available contrast sensitivity function (CSF) data vary widely due to the diverse spatiotemporal stimuli used over the years. To assist selection, this paper: (1) reports measurements of the effects on the CSF of varying the spatial and temporal windows of grating patches; (2) demonstrates that the widely discrepant CSFs from previous studies can be accounted for by using these results; and (3) discusses simple criteria for choosing CSFs for practical applications. CSFs were measured for several combinations of spatial and temporal waveforms, using the same subjects under otherwise identical conditions. The CSF was measured over the range of 0.5-10 c/deg using Gabor-type patches of 1.0-, 0.5-, 0.25-, and 0.125-octave spatial bandwidths using both abrupt and gradual temporal presentations. The results were compared with the CSF obtained with a fixed aperture (4 deg x 4 deg) grating pattern. Increasing the number of cycles resulted in increased sensitivity at intermediate frequencies, changing the CSF to a narrower bandpass shape. For each patch bandwidth, the gradual presentation CSF had a narrower spatial pass band than with the abrupt presentation. The relevance of the large differences in the CSFs obtained with different stimuli to our understanding of visual performance is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8494806     DOI: 10.1163/156856893x00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spat Vis        ISSN: 0169-1015


  7 in total

1.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method.

Authors:  Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jongsoo Baek; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Digital Enhancement of Television Signals for People with Visual Impairments: Evaluation of a Consumer Product.

Authors:  Matthew Fullerton; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Soc Inf Disp       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.140

3.  Visual Contrast Processing is Largely Unaltered during Saccades.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Eli Peli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-09-26

4.  Contrast sensitivity and higher-order aberrations in Keratoconus subjects.

Authors:  Einat Shneor; David P Piñero; Ravid Doron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The Effects of tDCS Across the Spatial Frequencies and Orientations that Comprise the Contrast Sensitivity Function.

Authors:  Bruno Richard; Aaron P Johnson; Benjamin Thompson; Bruce C Hansen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-27

6.  Perceptual saccadic suppression starts in the retina.

Authors:  Saad Idrees; Matthias P Baumann; Felix Franke; Thomas A Münch; Ziad M Hafed
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Monocular and Binocular Temporal Visual Perception of Infantile Nystagmus.

Authors:  Avital Moshkovitz; Maria Lev; Uri Polat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.