Literature DB >> 8494517

A retrospective clinical evaluation of resin-bonded bridges inserted at the Adelaide Dental Hospital.

T L Berekally1, R J Smales.   

Abstract

The clinical performance of resin-bonded Rochette and Maryland bridges inserted by various operators at the Adelaide Dental Hospital is reported. Thirty-four Rochette bridges (30 anterior, 4 posterior) and 228 Maryland bridges (150 anterior, 78 posterior) were assessed. Clinical data were compiled on types of bridge failure, factors influencing bridge retention, and the effects of the prostheses on abutment teeth and supporting tissues. The failure rate for Rochette bridges over 6 years was 75 per cent with a median survival of 2.14 years. Debonding occurred in 70 per cent of bridge failures. The failure rate for Maryland bridges over 5 years was 42 per cent with a median survival of 2.60 years. Pontic fracture (29 per cent) and debonding (20 per cent) were the main failures observed. Porcelain pontics performed significantly better than the processed hybrid resin pontics (P < 0.01). The main reasons for debonding included occlusal stresses, non-retentive bridge designs and resin cement failure. A life-table analysis showed no significant difference in the overall cumulative survival rates between Rochette and Maryland bridges. Bridge design and the choice of pontic material and resin cement emerged as significant factors influencing the success rate of the bridges examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8494517     DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1993.tb05468.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Dent J        ISSN: 0045-0421            Impact factor:   2.291


  5 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for single tooth replacement in an esthetic zone-review of conservative treatment options.

Authors:  Raghuwar Dayal Singh; Saumyendra V Singh; Pooran Chand
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec

2.  Survival characteristics of 771 resin-retained bridges provided at a UK dental teaching hospital.

Authors:  P A King; L V Foster; R J Yates; R G Newcombe; M J Garrett
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Fiber-reinforced Composite Resin Bridge: A Treatment Option in Children.

Authors:  Amit Gupta; Rama Krishna Yelluri; A K Munshi
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2015-04-28

4.  Immediate provisionalization and nonfunctional loading of a single implant in the maxillary esthetic zone: a clinical presentation and parameters for consideration.

Authors:  Konstantinos X Michalakis; Christos D R Kalpidis; Yvone Kirmanidou; Hiroshi Hirayama; Pasquale Lino Calvani; Argiris L Pissiotis
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2013-12-08

5.  Comparison of Tensile Bond Strength of Fixed-Fixed Versus Cantilever Single- and Double-Abutted Resin-Bonded Bridges Dental Prosthesis.

Authors:  Shweta Narwani; Naveen S Yadav; Puja Hazari; Vrinda Saxena; Abdulrahman H Alzahrani; Ahmed Alamoudi; Bassam Zidane; Nasreen Hassan Mohammed Albar; Ali Robaian; Sushil Kishnani; Kirti Somkuwar; Shilpa Bhandi; Kumar Chandan Srivastava; Deepti Shrivastava; Shankargouda Patil
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.748

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.