Literature DB >> 8492037

Comparison of bursting pressure of sutured, stapled and BAR anastomoses.

C A Bundy1, D M Jacobs, R T Zera, M P Bubrick.   

Abstract

The study was undertaken to compare anastomotic bursting pressure (ABP) of colorectal canine anastomoses using three different anastomotic techniques. Biofragmentable anastomotic ring (BAR), stapled, and sutured colon anastomoses were sequentially placed in each of 48 dogs following division of the colon at three equally spaced sites. Four groups of 12 dogs were sacrificed either on day 0, 3, 7, or 28 and ABP and bursting wall tension were determined. The data revealed that BAR anastomoses have the greatest strength on the day of surgery, sutured anastomoses are the strongest on the third day and all are comparable by the 7th day. Bursting pressures for all groups by day 28 approach normal colonic bursting pressure, with any differences likely to be a reflection of variation in anastomotic fibrosis and other factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8492037     DOI: 10.1007/BF00341267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  6 in total

1.  Biofragmentable bowel anastomosis ring: comparative efficacy studies in dogs.

Authors:  J W Maney; A R Katz; L K Li; W G Pace; T G Hardy
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. I. Bursting strength of the colon after left colon resection and anastomosis.

Authors:  H Jiborn; J Ahonen; B Zederfeldt
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Dynamic aspects of small intestinal rupture with special consideration of anastomotic strength.

Authors:  T S Nelsen; C J Anders
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1966-08

4.  A biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis. An experimental study.

Authors:  T G Hardy; W G Pace; J W Maney; A R Katz; A L Kaganov
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study.

Authors:  L P Fielding; S Stewart-Brown; L Blesovsky; G Kearney
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-08-09

6.  Prospective, randomized trial of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring. The BAR Investigational Group.

Authors:  M P Bubrick; M L Corman; C J Cahill; T G Hardy; F C Nance; C H Shatney
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.565

  6 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Anastomotic techniques for the gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  M G Laukötter; N Senninger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  The clipped intestinal non-perforating anastomosis of small bowel: a new technique.

Authors:  Stefan Holland-Cunz; Martin Chmelnik; Maria Roll; Patrick Günther; Karl-Herbert Schäfer
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Compression versus hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  A A P Slesser; G Pellino; O Shariq; D Cocker; C Kontovounisios; S Rasheed; P P Tekkis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  [Intestinal anastomoses and techniques in the lower gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  Z Mohr; S Willis
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  A biodegradable magnesium surgical staple for colonic anastomosis: In vitro and in vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Jian Cao; Mengmeng Lu; Yi Shao; Kewei Jiang; Xiaodong Yang; Xiaoyu Xiong; Shan Wang; Chenglin Chu; Feng Xue; Yingjiang Ye; Jing Bai
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-10-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.