Literature DB >> 8490374

Evaluating perinatal mortality rates: effects of referral and case mix.

M Clarke1, E S Mason, J MacVicar, D G Clayton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perinatal mortality rates as a method of auditing obstetric and neonatal care after account had been taken of transfer between hospitals during pregnancy and case mix.
DESIGN: Case-control study of perinatal deaths.
SETTING: Leicestershire health district.
SUBJECTS: 1179 singleton perinatal deaths and their selected live born controls among 114,362 singleton births to women whose place of residence was Leicestershire during 1978-87. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Crude perinatal mortality rates and rates adjusted for case mix.
RESULTS: An estimated 11,701 of the 28,750 women booked for delivery in general practitioner maternity units were transferred to consultant units during their pregnancy. These 11,701 women had a high perinatal mortality rate (16.8/1000 deliveries). Perinatal mortality rates by place of booking showed little difference between general practitioner units (8.8/1000) and consultant units (9.3-11.7/1000). Perinatal mortality rates by place of delivery, however, showed substantial differences between general practitioner units (3.3/1000) and consultant units (9.4-12.6/1000) because of the selective referral of high risk women from general practitioner units to consultant units. Adjustment for risk factors made little difference to the rates except when the subset of deaths due to immaturity was adjusted for birth weight.
CONCLUSION: Perinatal mortality rates should be adjusted for case mix and referral patterns to get a meaningful result. Even when this is done it is difficult to compare the effectiveness of hospital units with perinatal mortality rates because of the increasingly small subset of perinatal deaths that are amenable to medical intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8490374      PMCID: PMC1677328          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.306.6881.824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  6 in total

Review 1.  The condition of the literature on differences in hospital mortality.

Authors:  A Fink; E M Yano; R H Brook
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Monitoring perinatal mortality. A pathophysiological approach.

Authors:  J S Wigglesworth
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-09-27       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Logistic regression analysis and efficient design for two-stage studies.

Authors:  K C Cain; N E Breslow
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Place of birth and perinatal mortality.

Authors:  M Tew
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1985-08

5.  Home births in England and Wales, 1979: perinatal mortality according to intended place of delivery.

Authors:  R Campbell; I M Davies; A Macfarlane; V Beral
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-09-22

6.  Asian mothers' risk factors for perinatal death--the same or different? A 10 year review of Leicestershire perinatal deaths.

Authors:  M Clarke; D G Clayton; E S Mason; J MacVicar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-08-06
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Risk factors for stillbirths in a secondary level hospital at Ballabgarh, Haryana: a case control study.

Authors:  S K Kapoor; K Anand; G Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Reducing perinatal mortality among Indigenous babies in Queensland: should the first priority be better primary health care or better access to hospital care during confinement?

Authors:  Trisha Johnston; Michael Coory
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2005-05-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.