Literature DB >> 8488771

Applications of coronary flow velocity during angioplasty and other coronary interventional procedures.

J Segal1.   

Abstract

Previous studies utilizing Doppler catheters to assess blood flow immediately following coronary artery interventions have failed to demonstrate significant improvement in proximal coronary artery velocities or vasodilator reserve. Measurement of blood flow velocity, flow reserve, and the phasic diastolic/systolic velocity ratio in the distal coronary artery has been performed following various interventional procedures utilizing a low profile (.018 in) Doppler angioplasty guidewire. Following balloon angioplasty in 38 patients, average peak velocity increased significantly from 19 +/- 12 to 35 +/- 16 cm/sec in the distal coronary artery. The diastolic/systolic flow ratio improved from 1.3 +/- 0.5 to 1.8 +/- 0.5 and coronary flow reserve remained unchanged. Similar improvement in distal mean velocities (200%) versus proximal mean velocities (90% increase), and improvement in phasic velocity patterns, total velocity integral, and peak diastolic velocity were also noted in a separate study of 29 patients, before and after balloon angioplasty. Following excimer laser angioplasty in 10 patients, average peak velocity in the distal coronary artery was noted to increase from 6.3 to 13.0 cm/sec following laser alone, with a further increase to 20.6 cm/sec following adjunctive balloon angioplasty. The diastolic/systolic flow ratio increased from a mean value of 1.1 to 2.0 following laser recanalization, with a further increase to 2.9 following adjunctive balloon angioplasty. Following directional coronary atherectomy only modest improvement in distal average peak velocity was noted (24.7 to 31.2 cm/sec), with no significant change in diastolic/systolic velocity ratio (1.78 vs 2.04) immediately following the procedure. Measurement of distal flow velocity parameters performed immediately following coronary interventions may prove useful in assessing the hemodynamic result of these interventions and may prove useful in clinical decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8488771     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90130-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Clinical methods to determine coronary flow and myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  M J Wolters-Geldof; V M Cats; A V Bruschke
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-04

2.  Prevalence of microvascular disease in patients with significant coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J Qian; J Ge; D Baumgart; S Sack; M Haude; R Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Evaluation of coronary blood flow velocity during cardiac arrest with circulation maintained through mechanical chest compressions in a porcine model.

Authors:  Henrik Wagner; Bjarne Madsen Hardig; Stig Steen; Trygve Sjoberg; Jan Harnek; Goran K Olivecrona
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Repeated epinephrine doses during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation have limited effects on myocardial blood flow: a randomized porcine study.

Authors:  Henrik Wagner; Michael Götberg; Bjarne Madsen Hardig; Malin Rundgren; Jonas Carlson; Matthias Götberg; David Zughaft; David Erlinge; Göran K Olivecrona
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.298

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.