Literature DB >> 8488227

Neuroethics vs neurophysiologically and neuropsychologically uninformed influences in child-rearing, education, emerging hunter-gatherers, and artificial intelligence models of the brain.

A A Pontius1.   

Abstract

Potentially negative long-term consequences in four areas are emphasized, if specific neuromaturational, neurophysiological, and neuropsychological facts within a neurodevelopmental and ecological context are neglected in normal functional levels of child development and maturational lag of the frontal lobe system in "Attention Deficit Disorder," in education (reading/writing and arithmetic), in assessment of cognitive functioning in hunter-gatherer populations, specifically modified in the service of their survival, and in constructing computer models of the brain, neglecting consciousness and intentionality as criticized recently by Searle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8488227     DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1993.72.2.451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rep        ISSN: 0033-2941


  3 in total

Review 1.  Neuroethics: a modern context for ethics in neuroscience.

Authors:  Judy Illes; Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Comment on "Does it make sense to speak of neuroethics?".

Authors:  Eric Racine
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Neuroethics 1995-2012. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Guiding Themes of an Emerging Research Field.

Authors:  Jon Leefmann; Clement Levallois; Elisabeth Hildt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.