Literature DB >> 8487673

Variation in total energy expenditure in young healthy free-living men.

M I Goran1, W H Beer, R R Wolfe, E T Poehlman, V R Young.   

Abstract

Interindividual and intraindividual variation in total energy expenditure (TEE) were examined in 17 healthy, free-living men (weight, 56.4 to 82.4 kg; age, 18 to 30 years). TEE over 14 days, resting metabolic rate (RMR), and body composition were measured two or three times during 77 days of fixed caloric intake using doubly labeled water, respiratory gas analysis, and isotope dilution, respectively. When individual data were averaged, TEE was most significantly related to fat-free mass ([FFM] r = .73, P = .001), body mass (r = .70, P = .002), and RMR (r = .63, P = .006). After adjusting TEE for BM, a significant inverse relation with age was found (partial r = -.52, P = .032). Stepwise regression analysis showed that 69% of individual variation in TEE was explained by BM, age, and fasting respiratory exchange ratio (RER). TEE/RMR averaged 1.73 +/- 0.25 (range, 1.38 to 2.32), and was independent of age and body composition. In 10 subjects in whom triplicate observations of TEE were performed, the average experimental variation for TEE was +/- 11.9% (range, 6.1% to 19.6%) compared with a theoretical estimate of precision of +/- 5.9% based on the reported isotope dose and analytical uncertainty. The difference between theoretical estimates of precision and observed experimental variation suggests that inherent random variation in free-living TEE is +/- 10% (ie, square root of 12(2)-6(2)) in subjects maintained on fixed caloric intake. We conclude that in young free living men (1) BM, age, and RER are important determinants of TEE; and (2) intraindividual variation in TEE is approximately +/- 10% due to fluctuations in physical activity levels within individuals over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8487673     DOI: 10.1016/0026-0495(93)90108-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metabolism        ISSN: 0026-0495            Impact factor:   8.694


  7 in total

1.  Do African American women require fewer calories to maintain weight?: Results from a controlled feeding trial.

Authors:  Laprincess C Brewer; Edgar R Miller; Lawrence J Appel; Cheryl A M Anderson
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.080

2.  The work and home activities questionnaire: energy expenditure estimates and association with percent body fat.

Authors:  Gladys Block; Christopher D Jensen; Torin J Block; Jean Norris; Tapashi B Dalvi; Ellen B Fung
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2009

3.  Energy expenditure in adults living in developing compared with industrialized countries: a meta-analysis of doubly labeled water studies.

Authors:  Lara R Dugas; Regina Harders; Sarah Merrill; Kara Ebersole; David A Shoham; Elaine C Rush; Felix K Assah; Terrence Forrester; Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu; Amy Luke
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Comparison of methods to assess energy expenditure and physical activity in people with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ricardo A Tanhoffer; Aldre I P Tanhoffer; Jacqueline Raymond; Andrew P Hills; Glen M Davis
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing Indirect Calorimetry Into Routine Clinical Care of Patients With Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Amy Nevin; Hannah Mayr; Sridhar Atresh; Irene Kemp; Joshua Simmons; Angela Vivanti; Ingrid J Hickman
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2016

6.  Design of a randomised controlled trial: does indirect calorimetry energy information influence weight loss in obesity?

Authors:  Jonathan Lim; Uazman Alam; Daniel Cuthbertson; John Wilding
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Revisiting the Compensatory Theory as an explanatory model for relapse in obesity management.

Authors:  Catia Martins; Gareth R Dutton; Gary R Hunter; Barbara A Gower
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 7.045

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.