Literature DB >> 8485676

Variations in surgical rates in Quebec: does access to teaching hospitals make a difference?

R Blais1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document the geographic variations in the rates of 10 common surgical procedures in Quebec and to examine the relation between surgical rates and level of access to teaching hospitals.
DESIGN: Population-based rates standardized for age and sex were calculated from 1985-88 data from MED-ECHO (the provincial hospital discharge database) for each of the 32 community health districts (départements de santé communautaire [DSCs]) in Quebec. Variation across DSCs was analysed with the use of the ratio of the highest to the lowest rate, the coefficient of variation and the systematic component of variation. On the basis of an urbanization index designed by Statistics Canada, DSCs were classified as having a low, medium, high or very high level of access to teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: All Quebec residents except those whose DSC of residence could not be traced (accounting for no more than 1.7% of patients for any study procedure) and aboriginal people from northern Quebec. SURGICAL PROCEDURES STUDIED: Appendectomy, cesarean section, cholecystectomy, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), hysterectomy, inguinal hernia repair, prostatectomy, tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy, total hip replacement and varicose vein stripping.
RESULTS: There was considerable systematic variation in the surgical rates for all 10 procedures. Cesarean section, the rates of which varied the least, still exhibited almost a twofold variation between the highest and lowest rates. The rates of tonsillectomy varied the most, by a factor of more than five. With a few exceptions there was relatively little relation between the rates of the procedures within the DSCs. The rates of appendectomy, cholecystectomy, hysterectomy and tonsillectomy tended to be lower in the DSCs containing teaching hospitals, whereas the reverse was true for CABG. For the other procedures the relation between the rates and the level of access to teaching hospitals was nonsignificant.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall consistency of the observed variations with those of previous studies invites a closer look at the practice patterns and the scientific basis of the clinical decisions associated with procedures showing high variations in rates. The lack of a systematic relation between the surgical rates and the level of access to teaching hospitals challenges the belief that remote regions are underserved with respect to the procedures studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8485676      PMCID: PMC1485540     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  32 in total

1.  Variation in Michigan hospital use rates: do physician and hospital characteristics provide the explanation?

Authors:  J D Clark
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Variation in hospital admissions among small areas. A comparison of Maine and Michigan.

Authors:  L F McMahon; R A Wolfe; P J Tedeschi
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Variations in operation rates in New Zealand.

Authors:  A Simpson
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1986-10-22

4.  Variations in the use of medical and surgical services by the Medicare population.

Authors:  M R Chassin; R H Brook; R E Park; J Keesey; A Fink; J Kosecoff; K Kahn; N Merrick; D H Solomon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Are hospital services rationed in New Haven or over-utilised in Boston?

Authors:  J E Wennberg; J L Freeman; W J Culp
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-23       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Dealing with medical practice variations: a proposal for action.

Authors:  J E Wennberg
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Five-year study of surgical rates in Ontario's counties.

Authors:  E Vayda; J M Barnsley; W R Mindell; B Cardillo
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Geographical variations in use of surgery for glue ear.

Authors:  N Black
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  A decade of surgery in Canada, England and Wales, and the United States.

Authors:  E Vayda; W R Mindell; I M Rutkow
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1982-06

10.  Using diagnosis-related groups for studying variations in hospital admissions.

Authors:  N P Roos; J E Wennberg; K McPherson
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1988
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Does good science make good medicine? Incorporating evidence into practice is complicated by the fact that clinical practice is as much art as science.

Authors:  N P Kenny
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Distribution of physicians in Ontario. Where are there too few or too many family physicians and general practitioners?

Authors:  P C Coyte; M Catz; M Stricker
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Current practices of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  M Trevisonno; P Kaneva; Y Watanabe; G M Fried; L S Feldman; A Andalib; M C Vassiliou
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy versus non-surgical treatment for chronic/recurrent acute tonsillitis.

Authors:  Hamdy El-Hakim
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Defining basic services and de-insuring the rest: the wrong diagnosis and the wrong prescription.

Authors:  M M Rachlis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Regionalized delivery and variable utilization of coronary artery bypass grafting in Ontario from 1981 to 1991.

Authors:  A M Ugnat; C D Naylor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Revascularization after acute myocardial infarction: impact of hospital teaching status and on-site invasive facilities.

Authors:  J L Cox; E Chen; C D Naylor
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Variations in hysterectomy rates in Ontario: does the indication matter?

Authors:  R E Hall; M M Cohen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Appropriateness for Total Joint Replacement: Perspectives of Decision-Makers.

Authors:  Nathalie Clavel; Carolyn De Coster; Marie-Pascale Pomey; Claudia Sanmartin; Éric Bohm; Michael J Dunbar; C Y Frank; Gillian Hawker; Tom Noseworthy
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.