Literature DB >> 8485098

Center/surround relationships of magnocellular, parvocellular, and koniocellular relay cells in primate lateral geniculate nucleus.

G E Irvin1, V A Casagrande, T T Norton.   

Abstract

As in other primates, the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of the prosimian primate, bush baby (Galago crassicaudatus), contains three morphologically and physiologically distinct cell classes [magnocellular (M), parvocellular (P), and koniocellular (K)] (Norton & Casagrande, 1982; Casagrande & Norton, 1991). The present study examined quantitatively the center/surround relationships of cells in all three classes. Estimates of receptive-field center size (Rc) and sensitivity (Kc) and of surround size (Rs) and sensitivity (Ks) were obtained from 47 LGN relay cells by fitting a difference of Gaussians function to contrast-sensitivity data. For M and P cells, center size (Rc) increases with eccentricity but is about two times larger for M than for P cells at a given eccentricity. Surround size (Rs) increases with eccentricity for P but not for M or K cells. The center sensitivity (Kc) is inversely related to center size (Rc) and surround sensitivity (Ks) is inversely related to surround size (Rs) for cells in all classes, a result consistent with the sensitivity regulation that is produced by light adaptation. High spatial-frequency cutoff (acuity) is inversely related to center size (Rc). However, the peak contrast sensitivity is relatively independent of Rc. The ratio of the integrated strength (volume) of the surround to the volume of the center remains relatively constant (median, 0.87) across all three cell classes. This ratio is an excellent predictor of a cell's rolloff in contrast sensitivity at low spatial frequencies: cells with a low surround/center ratio have less low-frequency rolloff. Although M, P, and K cells generally display similar center/surround relationships, differences in center size and the other parameters between the classes distinguish most M, P, and K cells. These findings demonstrate that both similarities and differences in the visual-response properties of primate LGN cells in these three parallel afferent pathways can be explained by basic center/surround relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8485098     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800003758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  29 in total

1.  Dynamics of spatial frequency tuning in macaque V1.

Authors:  C E Bredfeldt; D L Ringach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Centre and surround responses of marmoset lateral geniculate neurones at different temporal frequencies.

Authors:  Bjørg Elisabeth Kilavik; Luiz Carlos L Silveira; Jan Kremers
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Correlates of motor planning and postsaccadic fixation in the macaque monkey lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  D W Royal; Gy Sáry; J D Schall; V A Casagrande
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Functional consequences of neuronal divergence within the retinogeniculate pathway.

Authors:  Chun-I Yeh; Carl R Stoelzel; Chong Weng; Jose-Manuel Alonso
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The Hermann-Hering grid illusion demonstrates disruption of lateral inhibition processing in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Nigel P Davies; Antony B Morland
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Morphology of P and M retinal ganglion cells of the bush baby.

Authors:  E S Yamada; D W Marshak; L C Silveira; V A Casagrande
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Perceptual decision related activity in the lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Yaoguang Jiang; Dmitry Yampolsky; Gopathy Purushothaman; Vivien A Casagrande
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Modeling lateral geniculate nucleus response with contrast gain control. Part 1: formulation.

Authors:  Davis Cope; Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Spatial visual filtering in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Nigel Philip Davies; Antony Bryan Morland
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Segregation of short-wavelength-sensitive (S) cone signals in the macaque dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Sujata Roy; Jaikishan Jayakumar; Paul R Martin; Bogdan Dreher; Yuri B Saalmann; Daping Hu; Trichur R Vidyasagar
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.