Literature DB >> 8484829

Prognostic significance of progression of coronary atherosclerosis.

D Waters1, T E Craven, J Lespérance.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Angiographic progression of coronary atherosclerosis is frequently observed in clinical practice and is used as an end point in clinical trials; however, its prognostic significance is unclear. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Progression defined as an increase in diameter stenosis by > or = 15% of at least one coronary lesion was seen in 141 (42%) of 335 patients who underwent repeat coronary arteriography after a 2-year interval as part of clinical trial. Coronary lesions were measured quantitatively from comparable end-diastolic frames selected by a radiologist viewing each pair of films together. During a mean follow-up of 44 +/- 10 months after the second arteriogram, cardiac death occurred in 19 patients (5.7%), cardiac death or nonfatal infarction was seen in 40 cases (11.9%), and 90 patients (26.9%) underwent coronary revascularization. At least one end point event occurred in 112 of the 335 patients. Sixteen of the 19 cardiac deaths were in progressors, a relative risk of 7.3 (95% CI, 2.2-24.7; p < 0.001). The relative risk of cardiac death or nonfatal infarction for progressors was 2.3 (1.3-4.2, p = 0.009) and of any cardiac event was 1.7 (1.3-2.3, p < 0.001). A stepwise multivariable Cox regression model of time to event was used to assess the relative contribution of progression as a predictor of coronary events. Low ejection fraction (p = 0.001), progression (p = 0.001), and hypertension (p = 0.011) were retained as predictors of cardiac death. Angina and the number of diseased vessels were the strongest predictors of revascularization.
CONCLUSIONS: Coronary progression is a strong, independent predictor of future coronary events, particularly cardiac death, and its use as a surrogate end point in clinical trials is justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8484829     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.87.4.1067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  33 in total

1.  Variability and accuracy of coronary CT angiography including use of iterative reconstruction algorithms for plaque burden assessment as compared with intravascular ultrasound-an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Paul Stolzmann; Christopher L Schlett; Pal Maurovich-Horvat; Akiko Maehara; Shixin Ma; Hans Scheffel; Leif-Christopher Engel; Mihály Károlyi; Gary S Mintz; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Efficacy of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors for prevention of stroke.

Authors:  S Warshafsky; D Packard; S J Marks; N Sachdeva; D M Terashita; G Kaufman; K Sang; A J Deluca; S J Peterson; W H Frishman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Spontaneous regression of proximal LAD subocclusive stenosis after left internal mammary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  S Dodic; D Kovacevic; M Bjelobrk; M Petrovic; T Miljkovic; M Cankovic; B Vujin; N Cemerlic-Adjic; B Dodic
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Prognostic value of age adjusted segment involvement score as measured by coronary computed tomography: a potential marker of vascular age.

Authors:  Chadi Ayoub; Leonard Kritharides; Yeung Yam; Li Chen; Alomgir Hossain; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Daniele Andreini; Daniel S Berman; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Ricardo C Cury; Augustin Delago; Allison Dunning; Gudrun Feuchtner; Millie Gomez; Heidi Gransar; Martin Hadamitzky; Joerg Hausleiter; Niree Hindoyan; Philipp A Kaufmann; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon Leipsic; Erica Maffei; Hugo Marques; Gianluca Pontone; Gilbert Raff; Ronen Rubinshtein; Leslee J Shaw; Todd C Villines; James K Min; Benjamin J W Chow
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Reproducibility and reliability of atherosclerotic plaque volume measurements in peripheral arterial disease with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  David C Isbell; Craig H Meyer; Walter J Rogers; Frederick H Epstein; Joseph M DiMaria; Nancy L Harthun; Hongkun Wang; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 6.  Imaging outcomes in cardiovascular clinical trials.

Authors:  Louai Razzouk; Michael E Farkouh
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  A winter's tale: report from the First Annual Canadian Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints Symposium.

Authors:  Therese Heinonen; David D Waters; Peter Libby; Jean-Claude Tardif
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Mechanisms of progression in native coronary artery disease: role of healed plaque disruption.

Authors:  J Mann; M J Davies
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Clinical and angiographic variables affecting the progression of coronary artery disease as determined by quantitative angiography.

Authors:  A Joseph; J D Talley; A Shih; T Crum; R Vogel; J Kupersmith
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1994-09

Review 10.  A new look at coronary angiograms: plaque morphology as a help to diagnosis and to evaluate outcome.

Authors:  J Lespérance; P Théroux; G Hudon; D Waters
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1994-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.