Literature DB >> 8482291

Qualitative changes in general movements and their prognostic value in preterm infants.

J J Geerdink1, B Hopkins.   

Abstract

Qualitative assessments of general movements have been shown to have considerable power in predicting neurological outcomes in preterm infants with brain damage. In the present study such assessments were made in 35 preterm infants without major neurological problems before term age, born between 27 and 34 weeks gestation, of whom 12 were small-for-gestational-age (SGA). Most infants maintained a normal or (mildly) abnormal quality from 35 weeks postmenstrual age through 6, 12, 18 to 24 weeks corrected age. Seven changed from initially abnormal movements to a normal quality, six of them after 12 weeks. Differences between SGA and appropriate-for-gestational-age infants became less evident with age, particularly after 12 weeks. This was not the case when comparisons were made on the basis of gestational ages below or above 32 weeks. The prediction of neurological and mental outcomes at 1 year also improved after 12 weeks, around which age a major transformation in neural functions occurs. It is concluded that assessments of movement quality are particularly successful in predicting abnormal outcomes in comparison to examinations based on muscle tone and elicited responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8482291     DOI: 10.1007/bf01956755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  19 in total

1.  Qualitative changes of spontaneous movements in fetus and preterm infant are a marker of neurological dysfunction.

Authors:  H F Prechtl
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Preterm and early postterm motor behaviour in low-risk premature infants.

Authors:  G Cioni; H F Prechtl
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Early predictors of neurodevelopmental outcome of very low-birthweight infants at three years.

Authors:  G Ross; E Lipper; P A Auld
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.449

4.  Common pitfalls in the evaluation of developmental screening tests.

Authors:  W K Frankenburg; J H Chen; S M Thornton
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Diagnosis of impaired fetal growth in newborn infants.

Authors:  H C Miller; K Hassanein
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Handicap in the preterm small-for-gestational age infant.

Authors:  J O Commey; P M Fitzhardinge
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  The premature small-for-gestational-age infant during the first year of life: comparison by birth weight and gestational age.

Authors:  I C Pena; A J Teberg; K M Finello
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) in pre-term infants.

Authors:  K Heinonen; R Matilainen; H Koski; K Launiala
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.901

9.  Early recognition of infants at high risk for cerebral palsy: examination at age four months.

Authors:  J H Ellenberg; K B Nelson
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.449

10.  Preterm or small-for-gestational-age infants. Neurological and behavioural development at the age of 6 years.

Authors:  M Hadders-Algra; H J Huisjes; B C Touwen
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.