Literature DB >> 8480695

Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I.

G W Arnett1, R T Bergman.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is twofold (1) to present an organized, comprehensive clinical facial analysis and (2) to discuss the soft tissue changes associated with orthodontic and surgical treatments of malocclusion. Facial examination leads to avoidance of potential orthodontic and surgical facial balance decline and enhances diagnosis, treatment planning, treatment, and quality of results. Patients are examined in natural head position, centric relation, and relaxed lip posture. Nineteen key facial traits are analyzed. By examining the patient in this format, reliable facial-skeletal traits can be recorded that enhance all aspects of care. Orthodontics and surgery used to correct the bite alter facial traits; alteration should reverse negative traits and maintain positive traits. This cannot be achieved without a complete understanding of the face before treatment. Tooth movement (orthodontic or surgical) used to correct the bite can negatively impact facial esthetics, especially if pretreatment esthetics are not defined before treatment. Treating the bite based on model analysis or on osseous cephalometric standards without examination of the face is not adequate. Three questions are asked regarding the 19 facial traits before treatment: (1) What is the quality of the existing facial traits? (2) How will orthodontic tooth movement to correct the bite affect the existing traits (positively or negatively)? (3) How will surgical bone movement to correct the bite affect the existing traits (positively or negatively)? This article is for orthodontists, and yet, much surgical information is included. This is intentional. We only treat what we are educated to see. The more we see, the better the treatment we render our patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8480695     DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70010-L

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  70 in total

1.  Comparison of lateral photographic and radiographic sagittal analysis in relation to Angle's classification.

Authors:  Atalia Wasserstein; Nir Shpack; Yossi Ben Yoseph; Silvia Geron; Moshe Davidovitch; Alexander Vardimon
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Cephalometric norms for orthognathic surgery in North Indian population using Nemoceph software.

Authors:  Tripti Tikku; Rohit Khanna; Rana Pratap Maurya; Sneh Lata Verma; Kamna Srivastava; Mangesh Kadu
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2014-08-28

3.  The relationship between 3D dentofacial photogrammetry measurements and traditional cephalometric measurements.

Authors:  Jose C Castillo; Grace Gianneschi; Demyana Azer; Amornrut Manosudprasit; Arshan Haghi; Neetu Bansal; Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Mohamed I Masoud
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Effects of malocclusions on facial attractiveness and their correlations with the divine proportion.

Authors:  Seden Akan; Ayse Gul Torgut; Hüsamettin Oktay
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Effects of combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment for class II and III correction on posterior airway space : Comparison of mono- and bignathic osteotomies.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Hartmut Feifel; Verena Maria Vehr; Jörg Alexander Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Surgery-first: a new approach to orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  F DE Nuccio; F DE Nuccio; M M D'Emidio; S Pelo
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-02-14

7.  Esthetic evaluation of facial cheek volume: A study using 3D stereophotogrammetry.

Authors:  Jie Feng; Hongyou Yu; Yijia Yin; Yinqiu Yan; Zheng Wang; Ding Bai; Xianglong Han
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Treatment of Midline Deviation with Miniscrews: A Case Report.

Authors:  Hasan Camcı; Cenk Doruk; Baran Talay
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  Soft tissue esthetic norms for mahabubnagar population of southern India.

Authors:  Jay Sinojiya; Kaladhar Reddy Aileni; Madhukar Reddy Rachala; Jaipal Reddy Pyata; Vankre Mallikarjun; C Manjunatha Reddy
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-01-12

10.  Photometric Evaluation of Soft Tissue Changes in CLP Patients: Le Fort I Advancement Osteotomy (ALO) Versus Anterior Maxillary Distraction (AMD).

Authors:  Joby Paulose; Eldho Markose
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.