Literature DB >> 8476582

Antibiotic treatment of sinusitis in general practice. A double-blind study comparing ofloxacin and erythromycin.

P Husfeldt1, F Egede, P B Nielsen.   

Abstract

The present study compared ofloxacin and erythromycin in a double-blind study with parallel groups for clinical efficacy and the number and severity of adverse reactions in patients treated in general practice for acute or chronic sinusitis. All patients lived in medium-sized to large towns and rural districts in the northern and western parts of Sealand, Funen and eastern Jutland, Denmark. Three hundred and nineteen patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 280 were clinically evaluable. From this total number, 136 patients were treated with ofloxacin (31 males and 105 females) and 144 patients were treated with erythromycin (40 males and 104 females). Following administration of either ofloxacin 400 mg once daily or erythromycin 500 mg twice daily for 7-14 days, 94.9% of the ofloxacin-treated group and 94.4% of the erythromycin-treated group were cured of their infections. There was no difference in clinical efficacy. Complications occurred in 18 of 155 patients in the ofloxacin-treated group and 32 of 164 in the erythromycin-treated group (P < 0.05), corresponding to 27 and 45 symptoms respectively (P < 0.01). This difference in adverse reactions principally involved gastrointestinal symptoms, i.e. 19 in the ofloxacin-treated group and 41 in the erythromycin-treated group (P < 0.01). Present findings show that the two antibiotics are comparable as to clinical efficacy, but the frequency of adverse reactions is significantly higher in the erythromycin-treated group due to the greater incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8476582     DOI: 10.1007/bf02540113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  3 in total

1.  Antibiotic susceptibility and phage-type pattern of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from patients in general practice compared to strains from hospitalized patients.

Authors:  V T Rosdahl; H Westh; K Jensen
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  1990

2.  Intracranial complications of paranasal sinusitis: a combined institutional review.

Authors:  G L Clayman; G L Adams; D R Paugh; C F Koopmann
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  [Treatment of sinusitis in general practice. A controlled investigation of pivampicillin (Pondocillin)].

Authors:  N Nørrelund
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1978-11-06
  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Economic evaluation of antibacterials in the treatment of acute sinusitis.

Authors:  C Laurier; J Lachaine; M Ducharme
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Efficacy and safety of azithromycin versus phenoxymethylpenicillin in the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis.

Authors:  R Hayle; E Lingaas; H O Høivik; T Odegård
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  The difference in pathogenic bacteria between chronic rhinosinusitis in patients with and without Sjogren's syndrome: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Pei-Rung Yang; Wei-Tai Shih; Yao-Hsu Yang; Chia-Yen Liu; Ming-Shao Tsai; Yao-Te Tsai; Cheng-Ming Hsu; Ching-Yuan Wu; Pey-Jium Chang; Geng-He Chang
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 4.  Systemic and topical antibiotics for chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Karen Head; Lee Yee Chong; Patorn Piromchai; Claire Hopkins; Carl Philpott; Anne G M Schilder; Martin J Burton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.