Literature DB >> 8476453

The effect of scrubbing and irrigation with normal saline, povidone iodine, and cefazolin on wound bacterial counts in a guinea pig model.

J M Howell1, T O Stair, A W Howell, D J Mundt, A Falcone, S R Peters.   

Abstract

This study examines the effects of povidone iodine, normal saline, and cefazolin alone and after scrubbing on bacterial counts in contaminated animal lacerations. Twelve albino guinea pigs each received four lacerations inoculated with a standard inoculum of Staphylococcus aureus. Twelve hours after inoculation, each wound was biopsied to ensure contamination and then either treated or left as an untreated control. One wound on each animal was an untreated control. The remaining three lacerations on six pigs were irrigated with cefazolin (CZ) solution, normal saline, or 1% (wt/vol) povidone iodine solution (PI). Three lacerations on another six pigs were treated with 20% poloxamer 188 scrub (scrub) alone, scrub followed by PI irrigation (SCR/PI), or scrub followed by CZ irrigation (SCR/CZ). Quantitative bacteriology was performed on tissue biopsies 2 hours (time 1), 7 hours (time 2), and 12 hours (time 3) after irrigation. Posttreatment counts for PI, CZ, and normal saline irrigation were not different from control or one another (P > .05). Bacterial counts for SCR/PI were significantly lower than control (P < .05) for all posttreatment biopsies (1.8 to 2.9 mean log(10) decrease). SCR/CZ was significantly lower than control (P < .05) at times 2 and 3 only (1.7 to 2.0 mean log(10) decrease). In this guinea pig model, cleansing 12-hour-old lacerations contaminated with S aureus using SCR/PI or SCR/CZ significantly reduced bacterial counts over 12 hours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8476453     DOI: 10.1016/0735-6757(93)90106-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  8 in total

Review 1.  Diabetic foot infections: stepwise medical and surgical management.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Benjamin A Lipsky
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  A surfactant-based wound dressing can reduce bacterial biofilms in a porcine skin explant model.

Authors:  Qingping Yang; Christelle Larose; Alessandra C Della Porta; Gregory S Schultz; Daniel J Gibson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-05-22       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Comparison of effects of suture and cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive on bacterial counts in contaminated lacerations.

Authors:  J M Howell; K A Bresnahan; T O Stair; H S Dhindsa; B A Edwards
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Effect of scrubbing and irrigation on staphylococcal and streptococcal counts in contaminated lacerations.

Authors:  J M Howell; H S Dhindsa; T O Stair; B A Edwards
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Diabetic foot infection: A critical complication.

Authors:  Jennifer J Hurlow; Gavin J Humphreys; Frank L Bowling; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  The guinea pig as a model of infectious diseases.

Authors:  Danielle J Padilla-Carlin; David N McMurray; Anthony J Hickey
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.982

7.  Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes between 4% Icodextrin Solution and Hyaluronic Acid- Carboxymethyl Cellulose Membrane during Emergency Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Kuan-Sheng Lee; Jian-Pei Huang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Water is a safe and effective alternative to sterile normal saline for wound irrigation prior to suturing: a prospective, double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Eric Alan Weiss; George Oldham; Michelle Lin; Tammy Foster; James Victor Quinn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.