Literature DB >> 8476405

The revised Stroop color-naming task in social phobics.

J I Mattia1, R G Heimberg, D A Hope.   

Abstract

Information processing was examined in a sample of social phobic individuals using a revised version of the Stroop color-naming task. In the first of two experiments, the response latencies of social phobics and matched community controls were compared when color-naming socially threatening words, physically threatening words and color words. Social phobics demonstrated greater response latencies regardless of type of stimulus word and additional interference in color-naming social threat words compared to the control group. The second experiment examined the cognitive structural change that has been hypothesized to accompany successful treatment of individuals with an anxiety disorder. Social phobics who were treated with cognitive-behavioral group therapy, phenelzine or pill placebo were classified as treatment responders or nonresponders, and their latencies to color-naming on the Stroop task were compared. Treatment responders showed a significant reduction in latencies to color-name social threat words (vs matched control words) while nonresponders did not. This effect was not demonstrated with color words or physically threatening words. Clinical implications and future research directions are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8476405     DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(93)90029-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  31 in total

1.  Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol.

Authors:  Matt Field; Brian Eastwood
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  A Tale of Two Threats: Social Anxiety and Attention to Social Threat as a Function of Social Exclusion and Non-Exclusion Threats.

Authors:  Julia D Buckner; C Nathan Dewall; Norman B Schmidt; Jon K Maner
Journal:  Cognit Ther Res       Date:  2010-10-01

3.  A preliminary investigation into whether attentional bias influences mood outcomes following emotional disclosure.

Authors:  K Vedhara; H Brant; E Adamopoulos; L Byrne-Davis; B Mackintosh; L Hoppitt; M Tovee; J Miles; J W Pennebaker
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2010-09

4.  The Pictorial Fire Stroop: a measure of processing bias for fire-related stimuli.

Authors:  Joanne Gallagher-Duffy; Sherri MacKay; Jim Duffy; Meara Sullivan-Thomas; Michele Peterson-Badali
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2009-11

5.  Neural response during attentional control and emotion processing predicts improvement after cognitive behavioral therapy in generalized social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  H Klumpp; D A Fitzgerald; M Angstadt; D Post; K L Phan
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  Attention bias modification: the Emperor's new suit?

Authors:  Paul M G Emmelkamp
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Distinct neural engagement during implicit and explicit regulation of negative stimuli.

Authors:  Jacklynn M Fitzgerald; Kerry L Kinney; K Luan Phan; Heide Klumpp
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Information processing bias and pharmacotherapy outcome in older adults with generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Amanda R W Steiner; Andrew J Petkus; Hoang Nguyen; Julie Loebach Wetherell
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2012-11-21

9.  Preconscious processing biases predict emotional reactivity to stress.

Authors:  Elaine Fox; Shanna Cahill; Konstantina Zougkou
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Moderators of the relation between popularity and depressive symptoms in children: processing strength and friendship value.

Authors:  Joan M Martin; David A Cole; Amalie Clausen; Jessica Logan; Heather L Wilson Strosher
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2003-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.