Literature DB >> 8476345

A comparison between sieving and optical scanning for the determination of particle size distributions obtained by mastication in man.

A van der Bilt1, H W van der Glas, F Mowlana, M R Heath.   

Abstract

Mixtures of particles of different sizes, as obtained after chewing, were analysed. Coarse, medium and fine mixtures of particles of an artificial (Optosil) test food were used. Mixtures of Optosil particles of known form and size (half-cubes) were used to validate the analytical methods. The results of both methods were described by particle size distributions based on the volume of the particles. Complete agreement between methods was found for the mixtures of half-cubes. In order to determine the median particle size by volume from the results of optical scanning an assumption on the form of the chewed particles had to be made. Using the assumption that, on average, the particles resemble spheres a slight overestimate of the median particle size was obtained for scanning as compared to sieving. It can be concluded that, although different aspects of the fragmented particles are measured, sieving and optical scanning are both adequate methods for quantifying mixtures of chewed food particles and yield similar results for the degree of particle size reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8476345     DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(93)90201-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Oral Biol        ISSN: 0003-9969            Impact factor:   2.633


  7 in total

1.  The challenge of mastication: preparing a bolus suitable for deglutition.

Authors:  Anne Mishellany; Alain Woda; Roland Labas; Marie-Agnès Peyron
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Factors associated with masticatory performance among preschool children.

Authors:  Maria Eliza Consolação Soares; Maria Letícia Ramos-Jorge; Bruna Mota de Alencar; Leandro Silva Marques; Luciano José Pereira; Joana Ramos-Jorge
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Turkish Version of the Mastication Observation and Evaluation (MOE) Instrument: A Reliability and Validity Study in Children.

Authors:  Selen Serel Arslan; Numan Demir; Aynur Ayşe Karaduman
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Masticatory efficiency in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  D Bakarčić; V Lajnert; N I Jokić; R Gržić
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2020-04-28

Review 5.  Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment.

Authors:  Thais Marques Simek Vega Gonçalves; Martin Schimmel; Andries van der Bilt; Jianshe Chen; Hilbert W van der Glas; Kaoru Kohyama; Martine Hennequin; Marie-Agnès Peyron; Alain Woda; Claudio Rodrigues Leles; Luciano José Pereira
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.837

6.  Methods for objectively assessing clinical masticatory performance: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Per Elgestad Stjernfeldt; Inger Wårdh; Mats Trulsson; Gerd Faxén Irving; Anne-Marie Boström
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-26

7.  Is the main goal of mastication achieved after orthodontic treatment? A prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Gustavo Hauber Gameiro; Isabela Brandão Magalhães; Mariana Marcon Szymanski; Annicele Silva Andrade
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 May-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.