Literature DB >> 8476193

The Angelchik prosthesis behaves as a fundoplication.

J R Lee1, J G Temple.   

Abstract

It is not known why the Angelchik prosthesis prevents gastro-oesophageal reflux. A review of 53 barium meal examinations in 39 patients with the prosthesis showed that in 43 examinations the prosthesis was below the diaphragm. In 38 of these a small knuckle of stomach had herniated through the prosthetic ring alongside the oesophagus, forming a small intra-abdominal para-oesophageal hernia. Radiological reflux occurred in only one patient with such a hernia. In the remaining five examinations where the prosthesis was correctly situated in the abdomen, there was no hernia within the prosthetic ring and reflux occurred in three. In ten examinations the prosthesis had migrated into the mediastinum. None of these showed a hernia and reflux occurred in eight. It is suggested that the Angelchik prosthesis results in the formation of a small para-oesophageal hernia within a loosely fitting ring within the abdomen and this is a requirement for the success of the Angelchik prosthesis. Radiographically the intra-abdominal para-oesophageal hernia inside the prosthesis results in buttressing of the intra-abdominal oesophagus in a manner similar to a fundoplication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8476193      PMCID: PMC2497772     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  11 in total

1.  Gastropexy and "fundoplication" in surgical treatment of hiatal hernia.

Authors:  R NISSEN
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1961-10

2.  A simple operative prosthetic treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  J G Temple; T V Taylor; J Alexander-Williams
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1984-01

3.  The Angelchik prosthesis for gastro-oesophageal reflux: symptomatic and objective assessment.

Authors:  R M Weaver; J G Temple
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  The Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Effects on the lower esophageal sphincter of primates.

Authors:  S B Benjamin; T K Knuff; M Fink; E Woods; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Pathogenesis of reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  W J Dodds; W J Hogan; J F Helm; J Dent
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  A quantitative assessment of results with the Angelchik prosthesis.

Authors:  J H Wyllie; D A Edwards
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Gastroesophageal reflux in children: evaluation of the water siphon test.

Authors:  J D Blumhagen; D L Christie
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  An effective operation for hiatal hernia: an eight year appraisal.

Authors:  L D Hill
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.

Authors:  M Deakin; D Mayer; J G Temple
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  A new concept in the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  S L Samelson; H F Weiser; C T Bombeck; J R Siewert; F E Ludtke; A H Hoelscher; S F Abuabara; L M Nyhus
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Atypical dysphagia with end-stage oesophageal disease 30 years post Angelchik device placement in a 72-year-old man.

Authors:  Mattan Arazi; Brian Vadasz; Benjamin Person; Ronen Galili; Jason Lefkowitz
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-01-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.