Literature DB >> 8476155

Comparison of continuous single layer polypropylene anastomosis with double layer and stapled anastomoses in elective colon resections.

C M Ceraldi1, E B Rypins, M Monahan, B Chang, I J Sarfeh.   

Abstract

The documented leak rate of the continuous single layer polypropylene (CSLP) anastomosis in elective colon resection is 0-6 per cent. It is more cost effective than stapling (S), and should be faster and easier to perform than the double-layer (DL) technique. However, there have been no reported series comparing the outcome of the CSLP anastomosis with the DL and S techniques. We reviewed the charts of 100 patients with elective colon resections. Eighty-four had data sufficient for analysis. There were 44 CSLP, 21 DL, and 19 S. The groups were comparable with respect to 12 preoperative variables. Proportionately more large-small bowel anastomoses were performed in the S group, and no patient in the S group was actively taking steroids. Clinical outcome was assessed. All leaks were clinically apparent and documented with contrast enema or laparotomy. The leak rate for the CSLP was 6.8 per cent (3/44). Two of the three patients with leaks were taking steroids. There were two leaks in the DL group (9.5%), one of which was taking steroids, and no leaks in the S group. The difference in leak rate between the three groups was not statistically significant. The average cost for CSLP at our institution is $4.00 compared with $8.00 and $35.00 for the DL and S, respectively. We conclude that the CSLP is a reasonable and safe alternative to DL and S anastomoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8476155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  8 in total

1.  Single-layer continuous versus two-layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  J M Burch; R J Franciose; E E Moore; W L Biffl; P J Offner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after single-layer continuous suture for ileocolonic anastomosis.

Authors:  Andreas Volk; Stephan Kersting; Hanns Christoph Held; Hans Detlev Saeger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Single-Layer Continuous Versus Double-Layer Continuous Suture in Colonic Anastomoses-a Randomized Multicentre Trial (ANATECH Trial).

Authors:  F Herrle; M K Diener; S Freudenberg; F Willeke; P Kienle; R Boenninghoff; C Weiss; L I Partecke; J Schuld; S Post
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Single Layered Versus Double Layered Intestinal Anastomosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sibabrata Kar; Vandana Mohapatra; Surendra Singh; Pratap Kumar Rath; Tapas Ranjan Behera
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-06-01

5.  Mid-term absorbable monofilament is safe and effective for gastrointestinal anastomosis - PROMEGAT - A single-arm prospective observational study.

Authors:  Petra Baumann; Jongwon Kim; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Hyung-Ho Kim; Hoong-Yin Chong; Moritz N Wente
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-06

6.  Use of Barbed Sutures in Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Single-Layer Sutures.

Authors:  Tomoya Tsukada; Masahide Kaji; Jun Kinoshita; Koichi Shimizu
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 7.  Evolution of the operative management of colon trauma.

Authors:  John P Sharpe; Louis J Magnotti; Timothy C Fabian; Martin A Croce
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2017-07-31

8.  Management of complications in surgery of the colon.

Authors:  M Gmeiner; J Pfeifer
Journal:  Eur Surg       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.953

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.