Literature DB >> 8475424

Social inequality in health--the role of the healthy worker effect.

E Dahl1.   

Abstract

Current occupational status is frequently used as an indicator of position in the socioeconomic structure in analyses of health inequalities. People outside the work-force are thereby ignored. One may hypothesize that due to a 'healthy worker effect' economically active people are a positively selected health group and that health-related exits from the labour marked are concentrated among low socioeconomic groups. One may therefore expect that this system of classification will show artificially small differences in health between socioeconomic groups. Analyses of material from a nation-wide representative survey and a complete set of mortality statistics confirm these expectations. When previously employed are included among currently employed, the differentials in health between the extreme groups in the occupational hierarchy widen. The system of classification has only a moderate impact on the main conclusion regarding men. For women, however, the conclusion depends more heavily on how they are classified. If one relies only on current occupation, small or inconsistent patterns emerge. Inclusion of previously employed has the effect of showing that low status women suffer from poorer health than high status women. This applies to several measures of health, i.e. morbidity, restricted activity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8475424     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90126-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  12 in total

1.  A prospective health impact assessment of the international astronomy and space exploration centre.

Authors:  L Y Winters
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Occupations associated with a high risk of self-reported back pain: representative outcomes of a back pain prevalence study in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Authors:  Sven Schneider; Slawomira Lipinski; Marcus Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The healthy worker effect in asthma: work may cause asthma, but asthma may also influence work.

Authors:  Nicole Le Moual; Francine Kauffmann; Ellen A Eisen; Susan M Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Social mobility and health: cause or effect?

Authors:  E Dahl
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-24

5.  Does Social Context Matter? Income Inequality, Racialized Identity, and Health Among Canada's Aboriginal Peoples Using a Multilevel Approach.

Authors:  Nicholas D Spence
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-04-22

6.  Gender, socioeconomic status, and self-rated health in a transitional middle-income setting: evidence from Thailand.

Authors:  Sam-Ang Seubsman; Matthew James Kelly; Vasoontara Yiengprugsawan; Adrian C Sleigh
Journal:  Asia Pac J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 1.399

7.  High mortality in lower salaried Norwegian men: the healthy worker effect?

Authors:  E Dahl
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Poor health, employment transitions and gender: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey.

Authors:  Myung Ki; Yvonne Kelly; Amanda Sacker; James Nazroo
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.380

9.  Cardiovascular health status between standard and nonstandard workers in Korea.

Authors:  Jong Ju Seon; Yu Jin Lim; Hae Won Lee; Jae Moon Yoon; Sang June Kim; Seulggie Choi; Ichiro Kawachi; Sang Min Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Employment history indicators and mortality in a nested case-control study from the Spanish WORKing life social security (WORKss) cohort.

Authors:  María Andrée López Gómez; Laura Serra; George L Delclos; Fernando G Benavides
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.