Literature DB >> 8475294

Hooked acromion: prevalence on MR images of painful shoulders.

R E Epstein1, M E Schweitzer, B G Frieman, J M Fenlin, D G Mitchell.   

Abstract

An association between the morphology of the acromion and the occurrence of rotator cuff tear (RCT) has been suggested by findings at both pathologic examination and routine radiography. As a tomographic technique, magnetic resonance (MR) assessment of acromial shape may be more accurate than routine radiography. The authors studied acromial morphology on sagittal oblique MR images of a control population (47 shoulders), of patients with isolated impingement (30 shoulders), and of patients with full-thickness RCTs (34 shoulders) to assess the association of acromial shape with disorders of the rotator cuff. Acromions were classified as flat (type 1), smoothly curved (type 2), or hooked (type 3). Data were collected by two observers, blinded to clinical and surgical information, who acted in consensus. Patients with RCT had a significantly increased prevalence of type 3 acromions compared with control patients (62% vs 13%, P < .001). Type 3 acromions tended to be more prevalent in the group with impingement (30%, P = .17). There was no significant difference in the distribution of acromion types among control patients with respect to age or gender.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8475294     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.187.2.8475294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  23 in total

1.  Clinically significant skeletal variations of the shoulder and the wrist: role of MR imaging.

Authors:  J M Mellado; J Calmet; S Domènech; A Saurí
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  [Impingement syndrome of the shoulder].

Authors:  M E Mayerhöfer; M J Breitenseher
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  The relationship of glenoid and humeral version with supraspinatus tendon tears.

Authors:  Nil Tokgoz; Ulunay Kanatli; Nuray Kadioglu Voyvoda; Serap Gultekin; Selcuk Bolukbasi; E Turgut Tali
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Classification and clinical significance of acromial spur in rotator cuff tear: heel-type spur and rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  Joo Han Oh; Jae Yoon Kim; Ho Kyoo Lee; Jung-Ah Choi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Glenoid axis is not related with rotator cuff tears--a magnetic resonance imaging comparative study.

Authors:  Metin Dogan; Nurdan Cay; Ozgur Tosun; Mustafa Karaoglanoglu; Murat Bozkurt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for the assessment of the rotator cuff after repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Gianpiero Cazzato; Mario Fodale; Giuseppe Sircana; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Acromial morphology in patients with calcific tendinitis of the shoulder.

Authors:  Maurice Balke; Marc Banerjee; Tim Vogler; Ralph Akoto; Bertil Bouillon; Dennis Liem
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison of low-field (0.2 T) vs high-field (1.5 T) imaging.

Authors:  R Loew; K F Kreitner; M Runkel; J Zoellner; M Thelen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Relationship of radiographic acromial characteristics and rotator cuff disease: a prospective investigation of clinical, radiographic, and sonographic findings.

Authors:  Nady Hamid; Reza Omid; Ken Yamaguchi; Karen Steger-May; Georgia Stobbs; Jay D Keener
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 10.  Impingement Syndrome of the Shoulder.

Authors:  Christina Garving; Sascha Jakob; Isabel Bauer; Rudolph Nadjar; Ulrich H Brunner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.