Literature DB >> 8475110

Adaptation to alcoholic fermentation in Drosophila: a parallel selection imposed by environmental ethanol and acetic acid.

M Chakir1, O Peridy, P Capy, E Pla, J R David.   

Abstract

Besides ethanol, acetic acid is produced in naturally fermenting sweet resources and is a significant environmental stress for fruit-breeding Drosophila populations and species. Although not related to the presence of an active alcohol dehydrogenase, adult acetic acid tolerance was found to correlate with ethanol tolerance when sensitive (Afrotropical) and resistant (European) natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster were compared. The same correlation was found when comparing various Drosophila species. Tolerance to acetic acid also correlated with the tolerance to longer aliphatic acids of three, four, or five carbons but did not correlate with the tolerance to inorganic acids (i.e., hydrochloric and sulfuric acids). These observations suggest that acetic acid is detoxified by the conversion of acetate into acetyl-CoA, a metabolic step also involved in ethanol detoxification. Future investigations on the adaptation of Drosophila to fermenting resources should consider selective effects of both ethanol and acetic acid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8475110      PMCID: PMC46353          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  10 in total

1.  Selection for increased desiccation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster: additive genetic control and correlated responses for other stresses.

Authors:  A A Hoffmann; P A Parsons
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Compared toxicities of different alcohols for two Drosophila sibling species: D. melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  J David; C Bocquet
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Comp Pharmacol       Date:  1976

Review 3.  Genetic variation of Drosophila melanogaster natural populations.

Authors:  J R David; P Capy
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Biological role of alcohol dehydrogenase in the tolerance of Drosophila melanogaster to aliphatic alochols: utilization of an ADH-null mutant.

Authors:  J R David; C Bocquet; M F Arens; P Fouillet
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 1.890

5.  Malate dehydrogenase activity and isozyme patterns during amphibian metamorphosis.

Authors:  W J Long; N E Garrison; C M Sellers
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B       Date:  1983

6.  Short-range genetic structure of Drosophila melanogaster populations in an Afrotropical urban area and its significance.

Authors:  J Vouidibio; P Capy; D Defaye; E Pla; J Sandrin; A Csink; J R David
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Alcohol dehydrogenase controls the flux from ethanol into lipids in Drosophila larvae. A 13C NMR study.

Authors:  A Freriksen; D Seykens; W Scharloo; P W Heinstra
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Enzyme variation, metabolic flux and fitness: alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R J Middleton; H Kacser
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Metabolic control analysis and enzyme variation: nutritional manipulation of the flux from ethanol to lipids in Drosophila.

Authors:  P W Heinstra; B W Geer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Acetaldehyde utilization and toxicity in Drosophila adults lacking alcohol dehydrogenase or aldehyde oxidase.

Authors:  J R David; K Daly; J Van Herrewege
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 1.890

  10 in total
  11 in total

1.  Evolution of the AMP-forming acetyl-CoA synthetase gene in the Drosophilidae family.

Authors:  Dev Karan; Maïalène Lesbats; Jean R David; Pierre Capy
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Mechanisms of naturally evolved ethanol resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  James D Fry
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  The Context of Chemical Communication Driving a Mutualism.

Authors:  Catrin S Günther; Matthew R Goddard; Richard D Newcomb; Claudia C Buser
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Acetic acid activates distinct taste pathways in Drosophila to elicit opposing, state-dependent feeding responses.

Authors:  Anita V Devineni; Bei Sun; Anna Zhukovskaya; Richard Axel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Deletion of a conserved regulatory element in the Drosophila Adh gene leads to increased alcohol dehydrogenase activity but also delays development.

Authors:  J Parsch; J A Russell; I Beerman; D L Hartl; W Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Phenotypic expression of ADH regulatory genes in Drosophila melanogaster: a comparative study between a paleartic and a tropical population.

Authors:  H Merçot
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  LUSH odorant-binding protein mediates chemosensory responses to alcohols in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M S Kim; A Repp; D P Smith
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Alcohol dehydrogenase activities and ethanol tolerance in Anastrepha (Diptera, Tephritidae) fruit-fly species and their hybrids.

Authors:  Eneas Carvalho; Vera Nisaka Solferini; Sergio Russo Matioli
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 1.771

9.  Conservation of social effects (Ψ) between two species of Drosophila despite reversal of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Sarah A Signor; Mohammad Abbasi; Paul Marjoram; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  A holidic medium for Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Matthew D W Piper; Eric Blanc; Ricardo Leitão-Gonçalves; Mingyao Yang; Xiaoli He; Nancy J Linford; Matthew P Hoddinott; Corinna Hopfen; George A Soultoukis; Christine Niemeyer; Fiona Kerr; Scott D Pletcher; Carlos Ribeiro; Linda Partridge
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-11-17       Impact factor: 28.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.