Literature DB >> 8475093

Molecular evidence that the spiny mouse (Acomys) is more closely related to gerbils (Gerbillinae) than to true mice (Murinae).

P Chevret1, C Denys, J J Jaeger, J Michaux, F M Catzeflis.   

Abstract

Spiny mice of the genus Acomys traditionally have been classified as members of the Murinae, a subfamily of rodents that also includes rats and mice with which spiny mice share a complex set of morphological characters, including a unique molar pattern. The origin and evolution of this molar pattern, documented by many fossils from Southern Asia, support the hypothesis of the monophyly of Acomys and all other Murinae. This view has been challenged by immunological studies that have suggested that Acomys is as distantly related to mice (Mus) as are other subfamilies (e.g., hamsters: Cricetinae) of the muroid rodents. We present molecular evidence derived from DNA.DNA hybridization data that indicate that the spiny mouse Acomys and two African genera of Murinae, Uranomys and Lophuromys, constitute a monophyletic clade, a view that was recently suggested on the basis of dental characters. However, our DNA.DNA hybridization data also indicate that the spiny mice (Acomys) are more closely related to gerbils (Gerbillinae) than to the true mice and rats (Murinae) with which they have been classified. Because Acomys and the brush-furred mice Uranomys and Lophuromys share no derived morphological characters with the Gerbillinae, their murine morphology must have evolved by convergence, including the molar pattern previously considered to support the monophyly of the Murinae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8475093      PMCID: PMC46314          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  7 in total

Review 1.  DNA hybridization in animal taxonomy: a critique from first principles.

Authors:  M Springer; C Krajewski
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  TED, an improved thermal elution device for the simultaneous hydroxyapatite chromatography of solution DNA/DNA hybrids.

Authors:  J A Kirsch; R J Ganje; K G Olesen; D W Hoffman; A H Bledsoe
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.993

3.  Indexes to the reassociation and stability of solution DNA hybrids.

Authors:  F H Sheldon; A H Bledsoe
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  DNA-DNA hybridization evidence of the rapid rate of muroid rodent DNA evolution.

Authors:  F M Catzeflis; F H Sheldon; J E Ahlquist; C G Sibley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 5.  Construction of phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  W M Fitch; E Margoliash
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Evolutionary distances in Hawaiian Drosophila measured by DNA reassociation.

Authors:  J A Hunt; T J Hall; R J Britten
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Amplification of an ancestral mammalian L1 family of long interspersed repeated DNA occurred just before the murine radiation.

Authors:  E Pascale; E Valle; A V Furano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total
  14 in total

1.  The isolation and characterization of putative mesenchymal stem cells from the spiny mouse.

Authors:  Hayley Dickinson; Phillipa Milton; Graham Jenkin
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Gaudeamus lavocati sp. nov. (Rodentia, Hystricognathi) from the early Oligocene of Zallah, Libya: first African caviomorph?

Authors:  Pauline Coster; Mouloud Benammi; Vincent Lazzari; Guillaume Billet; Thomas Martin; Mustafa Salem; Awad Abolhassan Bilal; Yaowalak Chaimanee; Mathieu Schuster; Xavier Valentin; Michel Brunet; Jean-Jacques Jaeger
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-06-12

3.  Determination of the evolutionary relationships in Rattus sensu lato (Rodentia : Muridae) using L1 (LINE-1) amplification events.

Authors:  O Verneau; F Catzeflis; A V Furano
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Comparison of area 17 cellular composition in laboratory and wild-caught rats including diurnal and nocturnal species.

Authors:  Katharine L Campi; Christine E Collins; William D Todd; Jon Kaas; Leah Krubitzer
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.808

Review 5.  Model systems for regeneration: the spiny mouse, Acomys cahirinus.

Authors:  Malcolm Maden; Justin A Varholick
Journal:  Development       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Amplification of the ancient murine Lx family of long interspersed repeated DNA occurred during the murine radiation.

Authors:  A V Furano; B E Hayward; P Chevret; F Catzeflis; K Usdin
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  The marsupial mitochondrial genome and the evolution of placental mammals.

Authors:  A Janke; G Feldmaier-Fuchs; W K Thomas; A von Haeseler; S Pääbo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Ear wound regeneration in the African spiny mouse Acomys cahirinus.

Authors:  Dino Matias Santos; Ana Martins Rita; Ignasi Casanellas; Adélia Brito Ova; Inês Maria Araújo; Deborah Power; Gustavo Tiscornia
Journal:  Regeneration (Oxf)       Date:  2016-03-09

9.  Muroid rodent phylogenetics: 900-species tree reveals increasing diversification rates.

Authors:  Scott J Steppan; John J Schenk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Macrophages and fibroblasts during inflammation and tissue repair in models of organ regeneration.

Authors:  Anthony L Mescher
Journal:  Regeneration (Oxf)       Date:  2017-06-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.