Literature DB >> 8475010

Targeting breast and cervical cancer screening to elderly poor black women: who will participate? The Harlem Study Team.

J Mandelblatt1, M Traxler, P Lakin, P Kanetsky, R Kao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Factors associated with participation in breast and cervix cancer screening among elderly black women of low socioeconomic status were determined.
METHODS: Data from a baseline cross-sectional random survey were used together with data on whether screening was subsequently completed or refused. The subjects were a random sample of women attending an urban public hospital primary care clinic for routine medical care with a birth year of 1924 or earlier.
RESULTS: Among the 271 women in the study group, 70% completed screening. Stated intent was the strongest predictor of participation; women who intended to have both mammography and Pap testing were 2.7 times more likely to participate than those who intended to have neither test (95% confidence interval 1.4, 4.9; P < 0.01), controlling for age, insurance status, and level of chronic illness. Women who had more than three chronic illnesses were twice as likely to participate than those with three or fewer illnesses (95% confidence interval 1.1, 3.4 P < 0.02), controlling for the remaining variables. Other variables, including age, history of a recent screening examination, attitudes, or knowledge, were not related to participation. Stated intent was the only variable that predicted compliance with both mammography and Pap smear completion in separate regression models for the individual tests.
CONCLUSION: A high proportion of elderly, socioeconomically disadvantaged black women will participate in cancer screening when it is offered in a primary care setting. Further research on behavioral intentions should be conducted to refine interventions designed to enhance the use of early cancer detection among vulnerable population groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8475010     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1993.1002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  9 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening.

Authors:  Roshan Bastani; K Robin Yabroff; Ronald E Myers; Beth Glenn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Effectiveness of care for older people: a review.

Authors:  C R Victor; I Higginson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-12

3.  Participation in cervical screening by older asian and middle eastern migrants in new South wales, australia.

Authors:  Nayyereh Aminisani; Bruce K Armstrong; Karen Canfell
Journal:  Health Promot Perspect       Date:  2012-12-28

4.  Knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and cancer screening among inner-city African-American women.

Authors:  J F Sung; D S Blumenthal; R J Coates; E Alema-Mensah
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Cervical cancer: screening hard-to-reach groups.

Authors:  E Grunfeld
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Factors related to noncompliance with screening mammogram appointments among low-income African-American women.

Authors:  S R Crump; R M Mayberry; B D Taylor; K P Barefield; P E Thomas
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Utilization of screening mammography among middle-aged and older women.

Authors:  Matthew Lee Smith; Angela K Hochhalter; SangNam Ahn; Meghan M Wernicke; Marcia G Ory
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Factors associated with intentions to adhere to colorectal cancer screening follow-up exams.

Authors:  Ying-Fang Zheng; Tami Saito; Miyako Takahashi; Teruo Ishibashi; Ichiro Kai
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Cost-effectiveness of a tailored intervention designed to increase breast cancer screening among a non-adherent population: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yoshiki Ishikawa; Kei Hirai; Hiroshi Saito; Jun Fukuyoshi; Akio Yonekura; Kazuhiro Harada; Aiko Seki; Daisuke Shibuya; Yosikazu Nakamura
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.