Literature DB >> 8474427

Surveillance for and comparison of birth defect prevalences in two geographic areas--United States, 1983-88.

J Schulman1, L D Edmonds, A B McClearn, N Jensvold, G M Shaw.   

Abstract

PROBLEM/CONDITION: CDC and a number of states have developed surveillance systems to monitor the birth prevalence of major defects. REPORTING PERIOD COVERED: This report covers birth defects surveillance in Metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia and selected jurisdictions in California for the years 1983-1988. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: The California Birth Defects Monitoring Program and the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program are two population based surveillance systems that employ similar data collection methods. The prevalence estimates for 44 diagnostic categories are based on data from 1983 to 1988 for 639,837 births in California and 152,970 births in metropolitan Atlanta. The prevalences in the two areas are compared adjusting for race, sex and maternal age using Poisson regression.
RESULTS: Regional differences in the prevalence of aortic stenosis, fetal alcohol syndrome, hip dislocation/dysplasia, microcephalus, obstruction of the kidney/ureter, and scoliosis/lordosis may be attributable to general diagnostic variability. However, differences in the prevalences of arm/hand limb reduction, encephalocele, spina bifida, or trisomy 21 (Down Syndrome) are probably not attributable to differences in ascertainment because these defects are relatively easy to diagnose.
INTERPRETATION: Regional differences in prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy termination may affect prevalences of trisomy 21 and spina bifida. However, the reason for differences in arm/hand limb reduction is unknown, but may be related to variability in environmental exposure, heterogeneity in gene pool, or random variation. ACTIONS TAKEN: Because of the similarities of these data bases, several collaborative studies are being implemented. In particular, the differences in the birth prevalence of spina bifida and Down Syndrome will focus attention on the impact of prenatal diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8474427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR CDC Surveill Summ


  16 in total

1.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the setting of intestinal malrotation.

Authors:  Timothy P Plackett; Ryan Takamori; Mark Izawa
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2011-11

2.  Ultrasound mass screening for congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract.

Authors:  Vito Antonio Caiulo; Silvana Caiulo; Clara Gargasole; Giovanni Chiriacò; Giuseppe Latini; Luigi Cataldi; Giuseppe Mele
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Untwisting the complexity of midgut malrotation and volvulus ultrasound.

Authors:  HaiThuy N Nguyen; Oscar M Navarro; R Paul Guillerman; Cicero T Silva; Marla B K Sammer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-01-04

4.  Comparison of upper gastrointestinal contrast studies and pH/impedance tests for the diagnosis of childhood gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Eva W Macharia
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-08-04

Review 5.  Genetic basis of human congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract.

Authors:  Simone Sanna-Cherchi; Rik Westland; Gian Marco Ghiggeri; Ali G Gharavi
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Transarterial renal embolization for enlarged horseshoe kidney.

Authors:  Akiko Fujisaki; Yoshifumi Ubara; Tatsuya Suwabe; Junichi Hoshino; Shohei Nakanishi; Masayuki Yamanouchi; Noriko Hayami; Eiko Hasegawa; Yuji Marui; Naoki Sawa; Fumi Takemoto; Kenmei Takaichi
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.801

7.  Thymidylate synthase polymorphisms and risk of conotruncal heart defects.

Authors:  Huiping Zhu; Wei Yang; Nathan Shaw; Spencer Perloff; Suzan L Carmichael; Richard H Finnell; Gary M Shaw; Edward J Lammer
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 8.  Novel Insights into the Pathogenesis of Monogenic Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract.

Authors:  Amelie T van der Ven; Asaf Vivante; Friedhelm Hildebrandt
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Genetic polymorphisms in the thioredoxin 2 (TXN2) gene and risk for spina bifida.

Authors:  Shu Wen; Wei Lu; Huiping Zhu; Wei Yang; Gary M Shaw; Edward J Lammer; Ana Islam; Richard H Finnell
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Nicotinamide N-methyl transferase (NNMT) gene polymorphisms and risk for spina bifida.

Authors:  Wei Lu; Huiping Zhu; Shu Wen; Wei Yang; Gary M Shaw; Edward J Lammer; Richard H Finnell
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.