J R Kerns1, T F Shaub, P B Fontanarosa. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Akron.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility, safety, and reliability of emergency cardiac treadmill exercise stress testing (CTEST) in the evaluation of emergency department patients with atypical chest pain. DESIGN: Thirty-two patients with atypical chest pain, normal ECGs, and risk factor stratification having low-probability of coronary artery disease were evaluated prospectively using outpatient, emergency CTEST. Study patients were compared with a retrospectively selected sample of admitted patients diagnosed with atypical chest pain who met the study criteria and were evaluated with CTEST as inpatients. All patients had follow-up at three and six months after evaluation. SETTING: University-affiliated community teaching hospital with 65,000 annual ED visits. RESULTS: All patients had normal CTEST. No patient had evidence of coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, or sudden death during the follow-up period. The average length of stay was 5.5 hours for emergency CTEST patients versus two days for inpatients. The average patient charge was $467 for ED evaluation with emergency CTEST versus $2,340 for inpatient evaluation. CONCLUSION: Emergency CTEST is a safe, efficient, cost-effective, and practical method of evaluating selected ED patients with chest pain. It is a useful aid for clinical decision making and may help to prevent unnecessary hospital admissions.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility, safety, and reliability of emergency cardiac treadmill exercise stress testing (CTEST) in the evaluation of emergency department patients with atypical chest pain. DESIGN: Thirty-two patients with atypical chest pain, normal ECGs, and risk factor stratification having low-probability of coronary artery disease were evaluated prospectively using outpatient, emergency CTEST. Study patients were compared with a retrospectively selected sample of admitted patients diagnosed with atypical chest pain who met the study criteria and were evaluated with CTEST as inpatients. All patients had follow-up at three and six months after evaluation. SETTING: University-affiliated community teaching hospital with 65,000 annual ED visits. RESULTS: All patients had normal CTEST. No patient had evidence of coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, or sudden death during the follow-up period. The average length of stay was 5.5 hours for emergency CTEST patients versus two days for inpatients. The average patient charge was $467 for ED evaluation with emergency CTEST versus $2,340 for inpatient evaluation. CONCLUSION: Emergency CTEST is a safe, efficient, cost-effective, and practical method of evaluating selected ED patients with chest pain. It is a useful aid for clinical decision making and may help to prevent unnecessary hospital admissions.
Authors: Ezra A Amsterdam; J Douglas Kirk; David A Bluemke; Deborah Diercks; Michael E Farkouh; J Lee Garvey; Michael C Kontos; James McCord; Todd D Miller; Anthony Morise; L Kristin Newby; Frederick L Ruberg; Kristine Anne Scordo; Paul D Thompson Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-07-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gregory G Johnson; Wyatt W Decker; Joseph K Lobl; Dennis A Laudon; Jennifer J Hess; Christine M Lohse; Amy L Weaver; Deepi G Goyal; Peter A Smars; Guy S Reeder Journal: Int J Emerg Med Date: 2008-06-03