Literature DB >> 8470612

Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis: quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging.

A C Eichenberger1, R Jenni, G K von Schulthess.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pressure gradients across the aortic valve due to stenosis of the valve must be measured accurately to evaluate the functional severity of the stenosis. Velocity-encoded cine MR has been used to quantify blood flow and flow direction and, more recently, the regurgitant fraction in aortic regurgitation. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and accuracy of velocity-encoded cine MR for estimating pressure gradients across the aortic valve in patients with aortic stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We used velocity-encoded cine MR to measure flow velocity and determine pressure gradients across the aortic valve in 19 subjects. The pressure gradient (delta P) was estimated from the simplified Bernoulli equation by using the maximum instantaneous aortic jet velocity (Vmax): delta P (mm Hg) = 4V2max (m/sec).
RESULTS: Maximum and mean systolic pressure gradients determined by using velocity-encoded cine MR were 3-148 mm Hg and 2-87 mm Hg, respectively, for all subjects. The pressure gradients correlated closely with gradients determined by using established methods: Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Correlation coefficients (r) were .96 (y = 0.94x - 1.9) and .97 (y = 0.97x + 0.5), respectively.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that velocity-encoded cine MR imaging provides a noninvasive and accurate means for quantifying the severity of valvular aortic stenosis. MR is a feasible method for determining pressure gradients across the aortic valve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8470612     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.160.5.8470612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  14 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging in valvular heart disease.

Authors:  M Schmidt; J Crnac; B Dederichs; P Theissen; H Schicha; U Sechtem
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-06

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  In vivo evaluation of quantitative MR angiography in a canine carotid artery stenosis model.

Authors:  M Calderon-Arnulphi; S Amin-Hanjani; A Alaraj; M Zhao; X Du; S Ruland; X J Zhou; K R Thulborn; F T Charbel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  MRI for diagnosing aortic valve stenosis: a comparison study of MRI and ultrasound.

Authors:  C van Pul; N M C M de Jong; L M van Beek; H L M Pasmans; P F F Wijn; R F Visser
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  [Functional cardiac MRI for assessment of aortic valve disease].

Authors:  F Sagmeister; S Herrmann; C Ritter; W Machann; H Köstler; D Hahn; W Voelker; F Weidemann; M Beer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Imaging and quantifying valvular heart disease using magnetic resonance techniques.

Authors:  George E Gentchos; Marc D Tischler; Timothy F Christian
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2006-12

Review 8.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Angela Morello; Eli V Gelfand
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2009-09

Review 9.  Aortic stenosis: evaluation with multidetector CT angiography and MR imaging.

Authors:  Eun Ju Chun; Sang Il Choi; Cheong Lim; Kye-Hyun Park; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Dong-Ju Choi; Dong Hun Kim; Whal Lee; Jae Hyung Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Aortic valve stenotic area calculation from phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance: the importance of short echo time.

Authors:  Kieran R O'Brien; Ruvin S Gabriel; Andreas Greiser; Brett R Cowan; Alistair A Young; Andrew J Kerr
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.