Literature DB >> 8470384

Does excluding patients without telephones affect the results of telephone reminder studies?

N L Danoff1, K J Kemper.   

Abstract

Studies of the effectiveness of telephone reminders to improve the rate of appointments kept have shown conflicting results. Few have accounted for patients without telephones. We conducted a controlled clinical trial to study the effect of excluding patients without telephones in a study of telephone reminders in an urban pediatric clinic. Telephone reminders were attempted the evening before scheduled visits for 238 subjects; 259 controls received no reminders. The overall rate of kept appointments was the same (54%) for both the intervention group and the control group. In neither group was there a substantial difference in the "show" rate between patients with and without telephones (intervention group 52% versus 57%, control group 55% versus 54%). In the intervention group, the show rate was higher for those with telephones who were contacted (66%) than for those who were not (37%) (P < .001). Telephone reminders did not improve the overall rate of kept appointments but appeared to result in a significant improvement in the show rate of those who could be reached. Excluding patients who could not be reached by telephone may affect the usefulness of previous studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8470384      PMCID: PMC1021938     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  14 in total

1.  Lowering appointment failures in a neighborhood health center.

Authors:  S J Gates; D K Colborn
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Lowering broken appointment rates at a medical clinic.

Authors:  S A Schroeder
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1973 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Individual matching with multiple controls in the case of all-or-none responses.

Authors:  O S Miettinen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Strategies for reducing missed initial appointments in a community mental health center.

Authors:  M P Kluger; A Karras
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1983

5.  Waning effectiveness of mailed reminders on reducing broken appointments.

Authors:  D L Morse; M P Coulter; L F Nazarian; R J Napodano
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Mailed versus telephoned appointment reminders to reduce broken appointments in a hospital outpatient department.

Authors:  D S Shepard; T A Moseley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Increasing the 'show rate' in a school problems clinic.

Authors:  G B Landman; E D Meade; P F Landman
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1986-11

8.  An intervention to improve follow-up of patients with otitis media.

Authors:  R Casey; B Rosen; A Glowasky; S Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.168

9.  Effectiveness of computer-generated appointment reminders.

Authors:  T G Quattlebaum; P M Darden; J B Sperry
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Differential effects of a phone reminder on appointment keeping for patients with long and short between-visit intervals.

Authors:  R Levy; V Claravall
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Prompts to encourage appointment attendance for people with serious mental illness.

Authors:  S Reda; S Makhoul
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.