Literature DB >> 8469458

Reproductive outcome after 143 laparoscopic procedures for ectopic pregnancy.

P D Silva1, A M Schaper, B Rooney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze reproductive outcome after laparoscopic procedures for ectopic pregnancy, with particular attention to laparoscopic salpingectomy.
METHODS: In a 260-physician multispecialty clinic in the rural upper midwestern United States, 143 patients were followed prospectively after undergoing laparoscopic procedures for ectopic pregnancy. Ninety-five who sought further pregnancies during the study period were analyzed for reproductive outcome. Intrauterine pregnancy rates were compared by age, parity, size of ectopic gestation, and evidence of prior tubal damage. Life table analysis was also performed.
RESULTS: The overall intrauterine pregnancy rates for laparoscopic salpingostomy (60%) and laparoscopic salpingectomy (54%) were not significantly different from each other. However, intrauterine pregnancy rates differed significantly by history of prior tubal damage. The pregnancy rate was 79% among women without tubal damage and 42% among women with damage.
CONCLUSIONS: Our intrauterine pregnancy rates after both laparoscopic salpingectomy and laparoscopic salpingostomy are similar to those reported in the literature for similar procedures performed at laparotomy. In predicting pregnancy outcome after laparoscopic procedures for ectopic pregnancy, the major variable seemed to be evidence of prior tubal damage. With no evidence of previous damage, we found similarly high pregnancy rates for laparoscopic salpingostomy and salpingectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8469458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  8 in total

Review 1.  Tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2012-02-10

2.  Tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Vinod Kumar; Janesh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-11-16

Review 3.  Tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-04-20

4.  Fertility outcome analysis after surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jingwei Li; Kailei Jiang; Fujie Zhao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Analysis of ectopic pregnancies admitted to emergency department.

Authors:  Yeliz Simsek; Mehmet Oguzhan Ay
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-04

Review 6.  Comparison of the Fertility Outcome of Salpingotomy and Salpingectomy in Women with Tubal Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaolin Cheng; Xiaoyu Tian; Zhen Yan; Mengmeng Jia; Jie Deng; Ying Wang; Dongmei Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Robot-assisted segmental resection of tubal pregnancy followed by end-to-end reanastomosis for preserving tubal patency and fertility: An initial report.

Authors:  Joo Hyun Park; SiHyun Cho; Young Sik Choi; Seok Kyo Seo; Byung Seok Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  The ESEP study: salpingostomy versus salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy; the impact on future fertility: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Femke Mol; Annika Strandell; Davor Jurkovic; Tamer Yalcinkaya; Harold R Verhoeve; Carolien Am Koks; Paul Jq van der Linden; Giuseppe Cm Graziosi; Andreas L Thurkow; Annemieke Hoek; Lars Hogström; Ingemar Klinte; Kerstin Nilsson; Norah M van Mello; Willem M Ankum; Fulco van der Veen; Ben Wm Mol; Petra J Hajenius
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 2.809

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.