Literature DB >> 8468999

A clinical trial of University of Wisconsin solution for pulmonary preservation.

R L Hardesty1, R Aeba, J M Armitage, R L Kormos, B P Griffith.   

Abstract

Suboptimal pulmonary preservation with modified Euro-Collins solution (9/90 to 4/91) prompted us to change to University of Wisconsin solution (4/91 to 4/92). Between September 1990 and April 1992, 94 patients received 100 pulmonary allografts (13 heart-lungs, 45 double lungs, 42 single lungs) that were flushed and preserved with either Euro-Collins (n = 30) or University of Wisconsin (n = 70) solution. Selection of donors and procurement and storage of donor lungs were identical. Bilateral single lung transplantation was performed more often in the University of Wisconsin group and resulted in a significantly longer graft ischemic time (University of Wisconsin group; 303 +/- 62 minutes; Euro-Collins group; 260 +/- 62 minutes; p = 0.007, t test). The use of cardiopulmonary bypass was not statistically significantly different. Preservation injury identified by the radiograph on day 1 was more severe (p = 0.036; Mann-Whitney U test) in the Euro-Collins group than in the University of Wisconsin group. In double lung and heart-lung recipients gas exchange of the allografts was evaluated by the arterial/alveolar oxygen tension ratios at nine intervals during the first 72 hours. The mean arterial/alveolar oxygen tension ratio was 0.62 +/- 0.26 in the University of Wisconsin group and 0.46 +/- 0.23 in the Euro-Collins group, but this difference did not reach significance (p = 0.119, analysis of variance). Despite the longer ischemic time, pulmonary preservation achieved by University of Wisconsin solution appears to be comparable with that achieved by Euro-Collins solution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8468999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  4 in total

1.  Effects of glucose on rat lung preservation: report of a study conducted on an isolated lung reperfusion model utilizing. Another isolated lung as a "deoxygenator".

Authors:  T Hanagiri; H Igisu; T Shiraishi; M Ikeda; K Yasumoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Preservation solutions for cardiac and pulmonary donor grafts: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Nicholas Latchana; Joshua R Peck; Bryan Whitson; Sylvester M Black
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Pulmonary transplantation.

Authors:  R D Davis; M K Pasque
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Donor lung preservation for transplantation-where do we go from here?

Authors:  Dirk Van Raemdonck; Jan Van Slambrouck; Laurens J Ceulemans
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.005

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.